Can any theme parks other then Disney use Disney show material?

Bravo 229

Member
I heard Mickey Mouse apeared at a local theme outside of disney and later on they played when you wish upon a star, Is that legal?

I'm not a legal expert, but I am very sure they would need consent from Disney to use any of the properties they have the exclusive rights to. If Mickey appeared at a local theme park, it was either pre-arranged between the companies, or they brought in the Mouse illegally (without permission). Now as for "When You Wish Upon a Star" I know that it has been covered/recorded by several artists (like Glenn Miller), so unless the lyrics/song are owned by Disney, it should be fine to use.
 

Rob562

Well-Known Member
I'm not a legal expert, but I am very sure they would need consent from Disney to use any of the properties they have the exclusive rights to. If Mickey appeared at a local theme park, it was either pre-arranged between the companies, or they brought in the Mouse illegally (without permission). Now as for "When You Wish Upon a Star" I know that it has been covered/recorded by several artists (like Glenn Miller), so unless the lyrics/song are owned by Disney, it should be fine to use.


Music use can often be covered under a broad license with music labels. Companies can buy a license for an entire music catalog, and then use any song within that catalog as they see fit, without having to get permission for each individual piece. That's why you'll hear things like Reflections of Earth being used on non-ABC news shows.

As for the Mickey, I have no idea.

-Rob
 

THEMEPARKPIONEER

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I know Disneyland Tokyo and Paris had to get a licensing, they arrant owned by the Disney company as I hear. They also display Alice in Wonderland and Cinderella in the Universal Studios Tokyo light parade. Maybe i should convince this local theme park to build an Electrical Parade LOL :rolleyes:. And a Mr toads ride since parks in New England like their cardboard for the rides.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
I have also heard the version of "Hooray for Hollywood" from GMR on the Tram Tour at Universal Hollywood. They do however the line "You may be Donald Duck" they muffle out the audio which I found strange.
 

muse1983

Well-Known Member
A few months ago I was at our local boardwalk in Bossier City,La and they started playing the Spaceship Earth ride track over the speakers....something so awesome has no place being played in Louisiana :ROFLOL:
 

THEMEPARKPIONEER

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
A few months ago I was at our local boardwalk in Bossier City,La and they started playing the Spaceship Earth ride track over the speakers....something so awesome has no place being played in Louisiana :ROFLOL:

Which track, I think some tracks from the original version tracks were created outside of Disney.
 

Thrill Seeker

Well-Known Member
I know Disneyland Tokyo and Paris had to get a licensing, they arrant owned by the Disney company as I hear. They also display Alice in Wonderland and Cinderella in the Universal Studios Tokyo light parade. Maybe i should convince this local theme park to build an Electrical Parade LOL :rolleyes:. And a Mr toads ride since parks in New England like their cardboard for the rides.

Paris is owned by TWDC. Also, Donald was the mascot for UoO, but isn't anymore.
 

fosse76

Well-Known Member
Don't know about this situation but I do know that Disney is very aggressive in defending its trademarks.

They have to be, otherwise they can lose copyright protection. It's one of the reasons Warner Bros. and JK Rowling pursue unauthorised uses of Harry Potter characters.
 

dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
Disney is one of the most vocal proponents of increasing the length of copy right on intellectual works. Every time that Mickey Mouse comes up for expiration they fight tooth and nail to renew it. That is also one of the reason for subtle tweaks to his image. Steamboat Willie would be the first to hit the public domain, but newer version of Mickey would still be covered until their coverage runs out.

There may have been a generic mouse in a tuxedo costume (many costume companies tweak em a bit so they can usually skirt around the copyright) but unless Disney for some reason decided to do some local park tie in, it shouldn't have been a real Mickey.
 

Bob Saget

Well-Known Member
Disney is one of the most vocal proponents of increasing the length of copy right on intellectual works. Every time that Mickey Mouse comes up for expiration they fight tooth and nail to renew it. That is also one of the reason for subtle tweaks to his image. Steamboat Willie would be the first to hit the public domain, but newer version of Mickey would still be covered until their coverage runs out.

There may have been a generic mouse in a tuxedo costume (many costume companies tweak em a bit so they can usually skirt around the copyright) but unless Disney for some reason decided to do some local park tie in, it shouldn't have been a real Mickey.
I'm surprised Nara Dreamland didn't have their very own Mickey Mouse greeting park guests on the streets. They successfully ripped off most other aspects of Disneyland, so why not? :rolleyes:

Edit: Sorry for the old thread bump. I was looking up topics on this after the Nara Dreamland, Europa park discussions in another thread from today.
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
Yes, you have to buy rights from Disney.

This is the reason why if I ever build a park of my own, it won't have a resurrected "Horizons" in it. Because even though it's an extinct attraction, it is still Disney's intellectual property.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Disney will sell rights to someone with money.

They defend IP where they can, certain Far East areas have a tendency to ignore any legal threat knowing it is worthless to them.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom