California Grill closing January 2013

rael ramone

Well-Known Member
Yes.

Just like the cruise ship redo ... that's the Disney Magic, which will be brought into the 21st century while in drydock later this year.

The company has an impressive track record, but I think the design on my favorite WDW resort locale is lazy and predictable. ... There is nothing that wows you. It looks very ... bland. ... Something that would have been cutting edge at a W Hotel in 2002.

My first impression was it looked like a Hilton Garden Inn Coffee Shop. (though on another thread I posted that it was more reminiscent of a Perkins or Waffle House - that'll get the DDP crowd happy!).
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Looks like they figured out we were on to them. The link isn't found anymore. To look at the renderings, check out this link.

http://www.disneyeveryday.com/uncovered-designs-for-the-disney-california-grill-restaurant-remodel/

I would guess they took it down more because they haven't announced the Disney Magic will be in drydock later this year and I 'outed' the fact that the ship on their site is indeed the Magic. ... It's just Disney trying to control the release of information like they always do.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
My first impression was it looked like a Hilton Garden Inn Coffee Shop. (though on another thread I posted that it was more reminiscent of a Perkins or Waffle House - that'll get the DDP crowd happy!).

I don't know if I'd take it that far, but it certainly isn't cutting edge or Contemporary. It will look nice, but also ordinary ... for that location, it should look spectacular ...or as the fanbois would say FABULOUS!!!
 

articos

Well-Known Member
That was a big oops for Puccini to put the Castle photo on the site. I agree it looks a bit bland, but that was likely the design brief, and Puccini does a LOT of corporate "look" restaurants, and they do them very well. They're one of the design groups of choice of the moment for hotel, theme park and upscale chain management firms. If you've been in a Kimpton, Hilton, Starwood, Fairmont, Hyatt or any new restaurant in Orange County, CA lately, there's a decent chance Puccini had a hand in it or bid on it. They also did F&B for Aulani. They're good at designing for high turnover. (Orange County restaurants are odd - they all have a design feel that says OC. Elements from the design then seem to creep out to the rest of the country over time.) For those afraid of being on top of the next table at the long row banquette, I expect those tables will be spaced farther than they look in the concept. I wish they had gone a bit "more" but will wait and see. I think it will feel better in person than it looks, even if I wish it were more future-retro or incorporated more themed and less any-restaurant.

RE: the menu and molecular gastronomy, it's difficult to do molecular on the scale that the CG does in covers, let alone maintain quality. Plus it's still pretty foreign to Joe Everybody, and although California Grill is one of a few restaurants on property that does a great job introducing diners to new things, that might be a bit too out-of-the-box. I would love to see some molecular cocktails at the bar, though. :)
 

dolce20

Well-Known Member
That was a big oops for Puccini to put the Castle photo on the site. I agree it looks a bit bland, but that was likely the design brief, and Puccini does a LOT of corporate "look" restaurants, and they do them very well. They're one of the design groups of choice of the moment for hotel, theme park and upscale chain management firms. If you've been in a Kimpton, Hilton, Starwood, Fairmont, Hyatt or any new restaurant in Orange County, CA lately, there's a decent chance Puccini had a hand in it or bid on it. They also did F&B for Aulani. They're good at designing for high turnover. (Orange County restaurants are odd - they all have a design feel that says OC. Elements from the design then seem to creep out to the rest of the country over time.) For those afraid of being on top of the next table at the long row banquette, I expect those tables will be spaced farther than they look in the concept. I wish they had gone a bit "more" but will wait and see. I think it will feel better in person than it looks, even if I wish it were more future-retro or incorporated more themed and less any-restaurant.

And I think you've described the problem perfectly: Puccini's designed EVERYTHING lately in the way of business-traveller hotels, Hilton's, Marriotts....It really pains me to see this magical and unique historical restaurant look like The Residence Inn, EVEN a trendy and hip Residence Inn! Not so long ago, Robert AM Stern and Michael Graves were hired to design Disney spaces where both designers were smart enough to "theme" their work, respecting Disney's vision with excitement and good taste. Too bad they couldn't give Puccini a run for their money. Will the CG look good when it's done? Yeah, of course..but good isn't good enough.
 

articos

Well-Known Member
Not so long ago, Robert AM Stern and Michael Graves were hired to design Disney spaces where both designers were smart enough to "theme" their work, respecting Disney's vision with excitement and good taste. Too bad they couldn't give Puccini a run for their money. Will the CG look good when it's done? Yeah, of course..but good isn't good enough.
That's because Mike Eisner is an architecture nerd/architect fanboy, and he wanted starchitects to put a stamp on all things Disney while on his watch. These days, the design briefs are done in-house, and then a Puccini or Rockwell or AvroKO is hired to realize the work, and they aren't paid or managed to put their top people on it. More they're allowed to manage the project like any other project in their portfolio, i.e. the client is a major corporation, but it's no different from Hyatt or Starwood asking.

It's also a difference in executive culture. Mike got his hands dirty in the decisions and micromanaged, to the annoyance of a lot of people around him. But he also picked up the phone and called people who underlings may not have had access to or been brave enough to call, and then he wrote a check. Iger comes from the movie world, so when he picks up the phone, it's to get Jim Cameron or Lucas or (formerly) Jobs on the phone. Iger is not that way for things outside his background/realm, and Staggs doesn't have that kind of knowledge or interest. It's just the difference between an Eisner and the people currently running P&R day-to-day. That means the people in the middle are actually doing the work for projects like the California Grill redo, and they're picking up the phone to work with people they know, which is Puccini, not Graves or Stern.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Let's see if those items last or even make it on the menu when the place opens.

A typical family at the Grill now comes in and orders 'the steak with none of that sauce stuff and no veggies and French Fries instead of that ... other ... whatever'' ... I've watched this countless times. It's the MAGIC of the DDP.
I believe the correct term is, "the lawn clippings on top".
 

MarkTwain

Well-Known Member
That was a big oops for Puccini to put the Castle photo on the site. I agree it looks a bit bland, but that was likely the design brief, and Puccini does a LOT of corporate "look" restaurants, and they do them very well. They're one of the design groups of choice of the moment for hotel, theme park and upscale chain management firms. If you've been in a Kimpton, Hilton, Starwood, Fairmont, Hyatt or any new restaurant in Orange County, CA lately, there's a decent chance Puccini had a hand in it or bid on it. They also did F&B for Aulani. They're good at designing for high turnover. (Orange County restaurants are odd - they all have a design feel that says OC. Elements from the design then seem to creep out to the rest of the country over time.) For those afraid of being on top of the next table at the long row banquette, I expect those tables will be spaced farther than they look in the concept. I wish they had gone a bit "more" but will wait and see. I think it will feel better in person than it looks, even if I wish it were more future-retro or incorporated more themed and less any-restaurant.

RE: the menu and molecular gastronomy, it's difficult to do molecular on the scale that the CG does in covers, let alone maintain quality. Plus it's still pretty foreign to Joe Everybody, and although California Grill is one of a few restaurants on property that does a great job introducing diners to new things, that might be a bit too out-of-the-box. I would love to see some molecular cocktails at the bar, though. :)

Just out of curiosity, why didn't Disney go to WDI for the refurb, since they're more likely to "get" the unique history and design intent of the hotel? For that matter, I'm surprised they didn't go to WDI for the cruise ships. As pleased as I am to see Disney embrace contemporary design firms in their projects, I don't see WDI can't be a great contemporary design firm (like how they were in the '60s). Eddie Sotto certainly showed WDI was capable of handling a modernist fine dining restaurant with LAX Encounter.
 

articos

Well-Known Member
Just out of curiosity, why didn't Disney go to WDI for the refurb, since they're more likely to "get" the unique history and design intent of the hotel? For that matter, I'm surprised they didn't go to WDI for the cruise ships. As pleased as I am to see Disney embrace contemporary design firms in their projects, I don't see WDI can't be a great contemporary design firm (like how they were in the '60s). Eddie Sotto certainly showed WDI was capable of handling a modernist fine dining restaurant with LAX Encounter.
They did, as they do with most any refurb on the properties. WDI discusses internally and gets any requests from F&B and the hotel in this case. The project producer/manager then has a designer within WDI help create a design brief, including reference and history. That brief discusses the direction they would envision the project going: contemporary, retro, mid-century, Belle's cottage, etc. Then they'll either make a call to an outside firm like Puccini, put it out as an RFP or for bid to select firms, or sometimes they'll keep it in-house. It's a matter of using internal resources wisely. With the amount of work that goes through WDI, these days they are more correctly a top level oversight to create and guide the ideas, then the mid-level work is done outside with WDI overseeing as the client, then they supervise/project manage the details during construction and do any specialized detail work. As for the cruise ships, same deal. WDI creates mood boards, design briefs and overall design work, but the mid-level work is sent out to firms who do this type of work everyday. There's also a practical aspect - restaurant design is a highly specialized thing, and if you mess it up, you risk having to go back and redesign/rebuild to fix it. Even though WDI has experts on staff in various fields, they may not have a specific restaurant designer who's also a great interior designer - by going to a Puccini, they know there's a team of experts in-house there who can all work on the project cooperatively. And sometimes it simply comes down to whether there's someone within WDI who decides they want to take ownership of the project and can make the resources available in-house.

Eddie is somewhat unique, in that he understands restaurants and is able to design a lot of various elements himself, out of his experience. He can do exteriors, interior design, dining room cutlery and flatware, chairs and booths, detail work, you name it. And he understands how dining room and kitchen flow work. That's not your typical designer. I don't know the specifics of how Encounter came together, but WDI had the right people who were available and the desire to do the project internally, so they did. Although that could happen (and does, sometimes) in today's WDI, Imagineering was different even in the 90s than it is today. Even then, though, they managed their resources and brought in outside vendors when they could.
 

Hoop Raeb

Formerly known as...
All of the windows have been replaced. Not sure if this has been mentioned in the thread previously or not.

I was wondering about that. The biggest gripe for me was that the original windows were highly reflective. I wonder if they replaced it with a low gloss window coating so that the restaurant lights don't interfere with the view.
 
Looking forward to seeing just how my favorite place to eat in the park turns out. I'm a fan of darker tones to
create warmth in places that carry an open floor plan. The last sample menu I saw looked very close to the one they had before. Being a fan of sushi, steak and flat bread, Im not extremely hard to wow. I will however miss Yoshi. Im glad the name has not been changed. I have the actual "Top of The World" poster that hung in the downstairs lobby, and I might have some CG napkins. :) As long as the food is good, I'll keep going. It is after all about family, friends, food and fireworks. Happy 4th of July!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom