News Buzzy’s been stolen?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BoarderPhreak

Well-Known Member
There is no story here and there never was. Buzzy's an ancient relic getting no love, like much of WDW's past attractions. Over time it seems, parts went missing before WDI finally removed what was left - forgetting to mention it at the proverbial staff meeting.

As for the URBEX'ers... They're trespassing, plain and simple - a misdemeanor. Let WDW prosecute to the fullest extent of the law and ban them; make examples of them.

Moving on... 🙄
 

DreamfinderGuy

Well-Known Member
WDI would never remove something that was tagged by Archives. If indeed this happened, they are no longer employed. In fact, those little tags literally say "Don't touch this, if it needs moved or altered, Archives will do it". They would be super ed if WDI did something to their stuff, and if they touched Buzzy and treated him like they did, they wouldn't be with Disney for much longer

Edit: Apparently this is my first encounter with the WDWMagic Censor that I just found out existed
 
Last edited:

LSLS

Well-Known Member
Don't forget Marni spreading the same story Hoot did!

Marni was deliberately vague. His statement can equally back either side. People who believe he was stolen and people who say Disney removed him both can point to Martin's statements (though I believe he made a statement that it was not one group doing something another didnt know about, but I'd have to go search 1000 posts to find it).
 

DeletedAccount55555

Well-Known Member
Marni was deliberately vague. His statement can equally back either side. People who believe he was stolen and people who say Disney removed him both can point to Martin's statements (though I believe he made a statement that it was not one group doing something another didnt know about, but I'd have to go search 1000 posts to find it).


I understand his statement from the perspective that he didn’t want to be directly quoted. But he also created a situation where he can claim to be right no matter what and that just irks me.

His statement was way too vague for anyone to say he and Dave Ensign said the same thing. They didn’t. Ensign gave a far more specific explanation and has been quoted on it, name and all, by a real news publication. A put a lot more stock in his comments because he’s risking his reputation if his information turns out to be wrong.
 

draybook

Well-Known Member
Wow, I've never seen the Mexico video before. Dude just strolled through like he was Iger. Also, as a party of 6 that requests a water side table at San Angel Inn, it blows my mind that we were seated next to not only a hallway, but a parking lot so close...
 

MickeyMinnieMom

Well-Known Member
You guys act like BDD is a spawn of the devil, sheesh. If you don’t like what he does then just ignore it. He’s not hurting anyone except Disney and himself by putting up his contraband photos
Yes. Spawn of the devil. That is precisely what I've been saying. :rolleyes:

I get it -- defending your friend. You seem quite buddy-buddy with him on Twitter. I check in every now and then in the hopes that he gets himself caught. Again.

I can't help but find his bravado pathetic, particularly when we know how he reacted in the PD under actual pressure, away from his keyboard. I still can't get over that he's 24... less mature than my middle schoolers and all their friends.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
I understand his statement from the perspective that he didn’t want to be directly quoted. But he also created a situation where he can claim to be right no matter what and that just irks me.

His statement was way too vague for anyone to say he and Dave Ensign said the same thing. They didn’t. Ensign gave a far more specific explanation and has been quoted on it, name and all, by a real news publication. A put a lot more stock in his comments because he’s risking his reputation if his information turns out to be wrong.

It's vague because it has to be. Again, go look at what he has said in the past. He is very rarely vague, and very rarely wrong. You are putting stock in someone because it is what you want to believe. For the record, I lean much more towards what Ensign stated than the idea he was stolen, but I'm not using him as any sort of evidence.
 

LSLS

Well-Known Member
Seems pretty clear to me.

Do you not remember when we were discussing, you made some point of an employee removing it, and Marni stated that did not happen? It could be a department, or it could be stolen. Either is plausible from his statements, and if you think he has confirmed one side, it's because that is what you want to hear. I actually have somewhat of a theory as to how this is going to all play out, and the end is it was removed by a department, but I'm far from confident in my theory, and it's laughable if anyone is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom