We're keeping the footer debate here because its a disorderly argument that better served in a disorderly thread. Let's not spoil the other thread with this nonsense.Sorry but the burden of proof falls on you to prove your facts...not on us doing the research to collaborate your facts.
OK...I'm leaving again!
That said, I already stated that I'm firmly convinced by all the evidence. More evidence is nice, but hard to come by. I am satisfied without a shadow of a doubt in the same way that Obama was 100% certain they had found Bin Ladan the night of the raid, against the recommendation of his entire cabinet who still needed more evidence. Finding that quote I mentioned is like looking for a needle in a hey stack, I what I read. Yes, the people who said this could have been misinformed, as anything is possible, but I trust it as I see no motive for inventing it.
Yes, maybe I will go searching for it, but I feel I have spent way too much time on this. I got the evidence I needed to my satisfaction. So, the only reason for me to do this is for the convincing of others. I may get an adrenaline rush and do that research later, but now I'm tired and un-motivated. At this point, I am beginning to care less what others think it is. I convinced myself that it is what it is and find the evidence irrefutable. If others don't, I'm okay with it.
The important thing is there are people within Disney who really know for sure. It is such a small element of the plan I posted on the other thread and is flexible enough to serve efficiently with or with that element. The plan's focal point is my DHS Intermodal Center, not the EPCOT easterly spur. I've included that component as an independent feature that could add a hotel, convention facilities, and retail to the system on vacant developable land which is east of Future World. The monorail does not dependent on it in any way, shape, or form, but its a value-added feature that may generate additional revenue.
To put simply, if the footer is there, the plan simply points out what Disney could do with, and it would be a nice value-added touch to an already cool proposal. If it doesn't exists, the plan without that element would still be a good plan. We leave it in the plan just in case it's there. No harm done if it's not and that portion of the plan is eliminated. No harm done.
