News Bob Iger is back! Chapek is out!!

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
The creator said it hasnt found its audience and the article literally showed these numbers as being lower than expected. Not sure what more you want.

The creator of the show isn't a good source for you?
I mean... no. There's no reason to believe that external content creators would be privy to Disney's internal viewership figures.
 

WondersOfLife

Blink, blink. Breathe, breathe. Day in, day out.
Avatar 1 made $58M on its recent rerelease. That's a movie that people can easily rewatch in their homes.



Ironically, I never hear or see anyone in public ever talk about this franchise. Lol
 

AEfx

Well-Known Member
What change made was conceived and executed entirely during Chapek’s tenure?
That's what I think some folks don't get. Pretty much everything we have gotten parks-wise would have been the same under Iger, it just would have been delivered with more finesse. To think that this stuff wasn't already in the pipeline is silly talk. I'm rather confident that even the pandemic changes were just accelerated - it has been Disney's dream to have park reservations/etc., they just finally had an excuse to roll it out.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
The creator said it hasnt found its audience and the article literally showed these numbers as being lower than expected. Not sure what more you want.

The creator of the show isn't a good source for you?
He was demonstrably using the Nielsen numbers incorrectly. He didn't understand it. We've had such problems with several people in the Movies forum using them wrongly to prove that the thing they hate was awful.

Mind you, they're using numbers from a list showing that that product was in the top ten for that week, but somehow, that showed how much people weren't watching!!

I'm sorry for the creator that he's saddened that his product wasn't more popular than Rings of Power that week. But it was more popular than hundreds of other products that week. Not everyone can be #1.
 

fgmnt

Well-Known Member
You are correct, though - that this is not going to get repeat viewings like the last one, and it's not going to be this "wow you have to see this new technology!" cultural event that drew everyone and their grandmother into theaters specifically to see this new fangled digital 3D tech.
It had a successful release a month or two ago, over a decade after release. People still like the movie. It is a movie worth going to see in a theater. James Cameron knows more about how to get people in a theater than anyone who has ever walked the earth.
 

CaptinEO

Well-Known Member
He was demonstrably using the Nielsen numbers incorrectly. He didn't understand it. We've had such problems with several people in the Movies forum using them wrongly to prove that the thing they hate was awful.

Mind you, they're using numbers from a list showing that that product was in the top ten for that week, but somehow, that showed how much people weren't watching!!

I'm sorry for the creator that he's saddened that his product wasn't more popular than Rings of Power that week. But it was more popular than hundreds of other products that week. Not everyone can be #1.
Got it, that explains things. Thank you.
 

CaptainAmerica

Premium Member
He was demonstrably using the Nielsen numbers incorrectly. He didn't understand it. We've had such problems with several people in the Movies forum using them wrongly to prove that the thing they hate was awful.
Many things can be true at once.

1. I think Andor has been excellent.
2. Disney has been disappointed with Andor's performance.
3. Andor has been in the top 10 of streaming on whatever given week(s).
 

CaptinEO

Well-Known Member
Many things can be true at once.

1. I think Andor has been excellent.
2. Disney has been disappointed with Andor's performance.
3. Andor has been in the top 10 of streaming on whatever given week(s).
Definitely. I think sometimes things may underperform but it doesn't mean it's some disaster. But it can show brand fatigue or maybe other underlying issues.

I personally am and have friends, family, and coworkers that are all Star Wars fans and only one has checked out Andor.

The people I talked with said they just need a break from Star Wars but will probably see it one day in the future.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
It will clearly do well, but there is no where near the perfect storm the first film had.

Not to belabor the Avatar discussion too much, but Cameron did make Titanic, a movie famous for everyone knowing the ending before seeing it, the number one box office success for some time.

I wouldn't bet against Avatar. Technology might be important, but honestly it's the first Disney tent pole in recent memory that didn't somehow involve a comic book character.
 

Chip Chipperson

Well-Known Member
Individually targeted ads are extremely expensive to implement and advertisers have shown an unwillingness to pony up and pay for them. I don't think they'll become the norm for SVOD any time soon. Instead, I think you'll see targeted advertising based on the content that people are watching. "I want 18-49 men, so I'm going to advertise on Mando," that sort of thing.

I say they start getting some more product-placement revenue for D+ content. Those Coke spheres are in Galaxy's Edge, so stick them in Mandolorian, Andor, and every other Star War series. Have Mando casually mention how he'd kill for an ice cold Coke and then Grogu uses the Force to get one from a local merchant's fridge and gives him a little wink. Synergy!
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
That's what I think some folks don't get. Pretty much everything we have gotten parks-wise would have been the same under Iger, it just would have been delivered with more finesse. To think that this stuff wasn't already in the pipeline is silly talk.

Yeah but Iger has an opportunity now that most execs don't get: he can change course and blame it on the other guy.

If something isn't working, I would fully expect Disney as an organization to acknowledge that and change directions. Easier when you can blame someone else, but still required even when you can't blame someone.

I think the real thing people don't get is, some of those changes actually are successful and don't need to be rolled back.
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
Not to belabor the Avatar discussion too much, but Cameron did make Titanic, a movie famous for everyone knowing the ending before seeing it, the number one box office success for some time.

I wouldn't bet against Avatar. Technology might be important, but honestly it's the first Disney tent pole in recent memory that didn't somehow involve a comic book character.
Titanic transends generations. Avatar is vague, had/has no popular character (no idea his name), and came out ages ago.

Plus, Titanic was super long for the time, and took up multiple VHS. That was an event that teens to grandma wanted to see.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom