Yep. Sea foam is only second to pixie dust in my addictions. Well, that and I free base churros.Clearly you would blindly defend Sea World no matter what the argument.
Yep. Sea foam is only second to pixie dust in my addictions. Well, that and I free base churros.Clearly you would blindly defend Sea World no matter what the argument.
Yep. Sea foam is only second to pixie dust in my addictions. Well, that and I free base churros.
No, I would be happy to engage, it's just that I don't see the need to engage discussion with those who find problems when no problem exists.Good for you, in that case there's really no need to enter in to a conversation if you're not going to engage the actual points people are making. You can enjoy Sea World and hope for a more humane environment for the animals you know, its not one or the other.
No, I would be happy to engage, it's just that I don't see the need to engage discussion with those who find problems when no problem exists.
And you know that how?Its not that no problem exists its just that you don't care.
And you know that how?
And your assumption that I don't care about animals because I don't agree with you is a mis calculation on your part. Do I think we should be cruel to animals, no. But I dont believe Sea World is being inhumane to their animals.Because giving an animal food only if does a trick, keeping it locked up in a confined space, separating it from its mother etc. are not humane. Its not that extreme to simply ask for a more humane environment for the animals. You're not saying anything worthwhile, you're just trying to argue for the sake of arguing.
1. The animals in captivity age give all they require in terms of food regardless if they perform or not. The food they are given for performing tend to be a preferred food or treat. Bottom line, the orcas are never sent to bed without dinner.Because giving an animal food only if does a trick, keeping it locked up in a confined space, separating it from its mother etc. are not humane. Its not that extreme to simply ask for a more humane environment for the animals. You're not saying anything worthwhile, you're just trying to argue for the sake of arguing.
I'm curious; such a change would obviously mean a quite extensive capital outlay. Is Seaworld just supposed to pay these monies out due to one documentary, or because some bands decided to stop playing a BBQ due to some change.org petitions? And what would happen to the conservation efforts by Seaworld should they need to spend on these new "environments?" The money, after all, has to come from somewhere....Are you even reading what I'm writing?? I JUST said that they should just keep them in a more natural environment, and that zoos are a good thing, that was the entire point of my post. Clearly you would blindly defend Sea World no matter what the argument.
Because giving an animal food only if does a trick, keeping it locked up in a confined space, separating it from its mother etc. are not humane. Its not that extreme to simply ask for a more humane environment for the animals.
That is absolutely incorrect.Because giving an animal food only if does a trick, keeping it locked up in a confined space, separating it from its mother etc. are not humane. Its not that extreme to simply ask for a more humane environment for the animals. You're not saying anything worthwhile, you're just trying to argue for the sake of arguing.
“We do not separate killer whale moms and calves. SeaWorld recognizes the important bond between mother and calf. On the rare occasion that a mother killer whale cannot care for the calf herself, we have successfully hand raised and reintroduced the calf. Whales are only moved to maintain a healthy social structure.”
It is statements like the one above that fan the flames of protest.
Do the SeaWorld bosses think it is still 1973 and a gullible public is going to swallow every word they say?
The way to “maintain a healthy social structure” for orcas---animals who live in matriarchal pods---is never to separate a mother from her calf.
SeaWorld routinely separates orca mothers from their calves. There’s a paper trail behind the transfers.
Evidently their position is it’s less risky to tell a lie than it is to tell the truth.
From the book Death At SeaWorld by David Kirby:
“In late 1984, a pregnant Katina was flown to her new home in Orlando. There, on September 26, 1985, she gave birth to Winston’s daughter, Kalina, the world’s first orca successfully bred in captivity. She became a media sensation and was dubbed Baby Shamu. Millions flocked to Orlando to see the highly promoted, first–of-its-kind newborn orca behind glass.
“The world fell in love with Kalina. SeaWorld jumped at the opportunity her arrival presented by launching a Baby Shamu Celebration tour. In February of 1990, at the age of four and a half, the calf was sent to SeaWorld in Ohio, where for eight months she performed in a show with whales she barely knew, followed by a seven-month stint at SeaWorld San Diego. In May 1991, she was flown to SeaWorld San Antonio.”
SeaWorld squeezed every nickel and dime they could out of that baby orca, shipping her all over the country during a promotional tour, separate from her mother.
The following historical data on orca mother/calf separations at SeaWorld comes from The Orca Project Corp:
CAPTIVE BORN (still alive):
Kayla - separated from mother at 2 years, 5 months
Keet - separated from mother at 1 year, 8 months
Takara - separated from mother at 12 years,8 months
Trua - separated from mother at 3 years, 2 months
Tuar - separated from mother at 4 years, 10 months
Unna – separated from mother at 6 years
CAPTIVE BORN (deceased):
Halyn - separated from mother immediately due to mother’srejection
Kalina - separated from mother at 4 years, 4 mos; reunited at 9 years
Katerina - separated from mother at 2 years, 5 months
Splash - separated from mother at 2 years, 6 months
Sumar - separated from mother at 10 months
Taku - separated from mother at 13 years, 2 months; died 11 months later
WILD BORN, SEPARATED AT TIME OF CAPTURE (still alive):
Corky 2 - separated at 3 years
(Corky had 2 miscarriages, 1 stillborn birth, and 4 live calves that died 11 to 48 days after their birth)
Kasatka - separated at 1 - 2 years
(became the first whale to be artificially inseminated in 2000, using Tilikum’s semen)
Katina - separated at 2 - 3 years
(1st “successful” mother in captivity with the birth of her calf Kalina)
Tilikum - separated at about 2 years
Ulises or Ulysses - separated at 2 - 3 years
STILLBORNS, MISCARRIAGES, AND DEATHS DURING BIRTH/PREGNANCY:
Known stillborn orca births in captivity: 14
Known orca miscarriages in captivity: 7
Known deaths of mother and calf during birth or pregnancy: 6
156 Orcas have died in captivity~ 42 Orcas remain in captivity
Orca families across the world have been torn apart to entertain us.
When you can provide some sources that do NOT come from Blackfish then you may have a point, but to continue to use Blackfish as a source to prove Blackfish's thesis is ludicrous.“We do not separate killer whale moms and calves. SeaWorld recognizes the important bond between mother and calf. On the rare occasion that a mother killer whale cannot care for the calf herself, we have successfully hand raised and reintroduced the calf. Whales are only moved to maintain a healthy social structure.”
The above statement is a lie that an industry would like you to believe is true.
It is a lie.
Finding itself in a PR crisis, SeaWorld has spent advertising dollars defending itself---with a lie.
That's one of the many reasons why I believe SeaWorld's captive orca program cannot be sustained indefinitely.
Orcas in captivity just does not work.
It is in particularly poor taste for a company in the business of family entertainment to lie to children and families.
________________________________________________________________________________________
"In the wild a killer whale mother might have her first calf at between the age of 12 and 15 and she will have a calf every 5 years after that on average. SeaWorld and the other facilities in the industry claim that they only separate mothers and calves when it’s for the good of the individual animals—when it benefits them."
"There’s absolutely no benefit to separating a mother and her calf before the calf is ready. So in captivity they are separating them at 18 months---at 2 years. That is the same as taking a toddler away from his or her mother. The reason they separate mothers from their calves is because at that age---just like the terrible two’s in human beings--- they become disruptive to the show. Whenever they do that they are breaking a bond that in nature would last for life."
Dr. Naomi Rose
Blackfish DVD
Special Features
“We do not separate killer whale moms and calves. SeaWorld recognizes the important bond between mother and calf. On the rare occasion that a mother killer whale cannot care for the calf herself, we have successfully hand raised and reintroduced the calf. Whales are only moved to maintain a healthy social structure.”
The above statement is a lie that an industry would like you to believe is true.
It is a lie.
Finding itself in a PR crisis, SeaWorld has spent advertising dollars defending itself---with a lie.
That's one of the many reasons why I believe SeaWorld's captive orca program cannot be sustained indefinitely.
Orcas in captivity just does not work.
It is in particularly poor taste for a company in the business of family entertainment to lie to children and families.
________________________________________________________________________________________
"In the wild a killer whale mother might have her first calf at between the age of 12 and 15 and she will have a calf every 5 years after that on average. SeaWorld and the other facilities in the industry claim that they only separate mothers and calves when it’s for the good of the individual animals—when it benefits them."
"There’s absolutely no benefit to separating a mother and her calf before the calf is ready. So in captivity they are separating them at 18 months---at 2 years. That is the same as taking a toddler away from his or her mother. The reason they separate mothers from their calves is because at that age---just like the terrible two’s in human beings--- they become disruptive to the show. Whenever they do that they are breaking a bond that in nature would last for life."
Dr. Naomi Rose
Blackfish DVD
Special Features
Let me run a hypothetical situation by you.
It is really hard to argue that whales in captivity have done a huge amount for raising awareness to the whales plight in the wild. Commercial whaling was not banned by the IWC until 1986 partially as a result of this awareness. Would you rather have a very small number of whales in captivity, or a number of whale species go extinct simply because the general public either did not know or care?
I see watching documentaries has taught you well. You have presented information that looks utterly horrible when presented alone. What you have neglected to do is compare Sea Worlds data with what happens in the wild.
What is the infant mortality rate in the wild compared to captivity?
What is the still birth rate in the wild compared to captivity?
On the occasion that a whale does leave the pod, at what age does that happen in the wild compared to captivity?
@JPatton , and others fighting the good fight...keep it up! Continue to share your thoughts on the subject, as you are freely allowed to do despite what others may say. You have friends here who back you!
"If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything."
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.