Jedijax719
Well-Known Member

Lupita Nyong'o opens up about recasting T'Challa for Black Panther 2
The actor says that the Marvel sequel's rewritten script "honored the truth" of grieving Chadwick Boseman

I am pretty sure the death of the current Black Panther who was Wakanda's protector in a movie where Wakanda is being openly challenged by Atlantis and others is a key factor to raise don't you? It will drive the whole story of what can Wakanda do without its protector? I don't believe they are "milking it" for marketing.Does it seem wrong they are milking the whole death of Chadwick Boseman in their advertising? "Come see our movie to help honor his memory." He was a fine actor. Outside of Marvel, he was in some decent smaller movies. Gods of Egypt, however, was terrible. It would have been nice to see what kind of actor he evolved into outside of Marvel.
Except if he didn't die, that wouldn't be the story. Unlike the Star Wars sequels, Marvel is suppose to be planning each of these phases years in advance. This is a case where they just pivoted to take advantage of the situation.I am pretty sure the death of the current Black Panther who was Wakanda's protector in a movie where Wakanda is being openly challenged by Atlantis and others is a key factor to raise don't you? It will drive the whole story of what can Wakanda do without its protector? I don't believe they are "milking it" for marketing.
Again, lets review the reality. They had no knowledge per reports that this could happen, he died. All they did was pivot to a storyline that has happened in the comics where T'Challa was dead and was replaced. Some of you have to get over that not all the story lines must be the same actor forever. As much as a few are screaming they should have just recasted, there would be just as many screaming how could they recast him! MCU can't win in these casesExcept if he didn't die, that wouldn't be the story. Unlike the Star Wars sequels, Marvel is suppose to be planning each of these phases years in advance. This is a case where they just pivoted to take advantage of the situation.
Yeah, I don't think "Take advantage of the situation" is the correct term. This is no advantage to them, they are in a much worse position. I think it's more "Trying to make do with a terrible situation."Except if he didn't die, that wouldn't be the story. Unlike the Star Wars sequels, Marvel is suppose to be planning each of these phases years in advance. This is a case where they just pivoted to take advantage of the situation.
Exactly. Hence the milking his death. They didn't have to do it.Right from the introduction of Black Panther in the MCU we learned that "Black Panther" was a mantle that was passed down or had to be won through battle. And depending who was carrying that mantle, there were significant repercussions with regard to the choices they made.
So... it is absolutely 'canon' to expect a new person to become *the* Black Panther if the current one dies (or goes missing). So, there is no reason to replace T'Challa with a new actor like with the Bond movies. *The* Black Panther lives on without him in the person wearing the mantle. Just like it was passed from T'Challa's father to himself.
This isn't a gimmick devised to get around an actor's death. It is the way of Wakanda when the current Black Panther dies (or gets too old, in the case of T'Challa's father). It was established from the outset of Black Panther's introduction into the MCU.
They had 3 choices:Exactly. Hence the milking his death. They didn't have to do it.
Call it milking all you want if that's your opinion.Exactly. Hence the milking his death. They didn't have to do it.
Marvel movies usually start strong, even if they're bad movies (like Dr. Strange 2 and Thor 4). Word of mouth will probably cause it to fizzle in later weeks though. Afterall it's hard to sell a Black Panther movie without T'Challa.
Maybe.Call it milking all you want if that's your opinion.
I call it 'dealing.'
Then if anyone is milking it, it's the said media outlets that are doing so.Maybe.
Dealing would be just a new story, trailer and release.
Milking is multiple internet stories on it and interviews with cast before the thing is released.
For example: https://www.avclub.com/lupita-nyongo-black-panther-wakanda-forever-recasting-1849677247
While I understand your opinion and the impression you get from these articles but I have to agree with others, this isn't Disney/Marvel milking it. Its rather them answering questions based on the interviewers questions on the topic. Its not like they are releasing statements on the topic. Its being asked a direct question on how they are handling Chadwick's death within the movie, and questions surrounding recasting. I mean what are they suppose to do, say sorry no comment?!? Of course not.Maybe.
Dealing would be just a new story, trailer and release.
Milking is multiple internet stories on it and interviews with cast before the thing is released.
For example: https://www.avclub.com/lupita-nyongo-black-panther-wakanda-forever-recasting-1849677247
Not sure why you keep posting stuff that is easily proven as being false.
Just like Captain America Black Panther is not a person its a mantle. And just like Captain America a mantle that has been used by others in both the comics and even the MCU. This has been explained by others. So yes you can market and sell a Black Panther movie without T'Challa, as shown in all the trailers. Because T'Challa, while a fan favorite character, has not and will not be the only Black Panther in the MCU.
The only question remains is whether Marvel will eventually recast T'Challa or not. Based on their current stance the answer is no, but it remains to be seen if that stance will change or not as the years pass.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.