SailorMercury
Well-Known Member
Thanks I tryThank you for that wonderful information!
Thanks I tryThank you for that wonderful information!
By the objective definition of "investment", yes they clearly did.But did they?
Or….But I'm not going to keep complaining when the other option was keep the dead park from the 2000s.
Well covid is not a valid excuse…as cash available soared for companiesBy the objective definition of "investment", yes they clearly did.
Whether you like the investment or not is up to you, but the park pre-2017 had been stagnant for decades. They finally decided to make an effort to do something about it. Yes, the final result is not what most of us were hoping for (and to give credit, the plans got screwed by COVID). But I'm not going to keep complaining when the other option was keep the dead park from the 2000s.
Amen to that. I believe they originally had 19 plots for countries. However, they've used up two of those to expand Norway / Frozen and to expand France with the Ratatouille ride. Six spots remain (including where the once planned Africa pavilion became only a refreshment spot). I'd love to see India, Greece, and Brazil for starters.What I wanted more than anything for a "New" Epcot? A new country added to World Showcase. I was disappointed to say the least.
Back at WDW in two days and cannot wait to spend more time in this beautiful area again in some warmer weather. I can't believe how great FW looks now compared to that hideous trash that was there before. I still miss the Fountain of Nations though.
I know we all like to say Disney is for the young and the young at heart, but you do know the parks are primarily for that first part, right? Outside of the fanatics there aren't many regular people planning WDW trips that don't revolve around their kids. I would hope they are thinking about how they can appeal to a 13 year old when designing things.Good god, I sure hope Bob isn't depending on 13 year olds to shape any park goals.
And *controversial opinion* but I think it's great they're trying to make Epcot appeal to the younger crowd; I just wish they were going about it in bit more thoughtful manner. But yeah, this "it's pathetic and offensive Disney is creating something for kids and not my grown adult self" is so embarrassing and entitled.I know we all like to say Disney is for the young and the young at heart, but you do know the parks are primarily for that first part, right? Outside of the fanatics there aren't many regular people planning WDW trips that don't revolve around their kids. I would hope they are thinking about how they can appeal to a 13 year old when designing things.
I know it's an extreme longshot, but the D23 event in Brazil gives me some hope. A new country would be amazing.What I wanted more than anything for a "New" Epcot? A new country added to World Showcase. I was disappointed to say the least.
Not surprisingly, you totally misunderstood my post.And *controversial opinion* but I think it's great they're trying to make Epcot appeal to the younger crowd; I just wish they were going about it in bit more thoughtful manner. But yeah, this "it's pathetic and offensive Disney is creating something for kids and not my grown adult self" is so embarrassing and entitled.
I think becoming an uncle last year really changed how I feel about children
There was nothing to understand since, not surprisingly, it was nonsense as usual.Not surprisingly, you totally misunderstood my post.
If only they had a ton of dinosaur fossil replicas and dinosaur statues that were about to become “homeless”…to leave WOL empty is a sin
This is precisely it. There was plenty about EPCOT which inherently appealed to audiences of all ages. Take The Living Seas for example, the whole show about descending into an underwater research base, the grand reveal of traveling under and into the aquarium, being able to walk around Seabase Alpha and see all the marine life, etc.And *controversial opinion* but I think it's great they're trying to make Epcot appeal to the younger crowd; I just wish they were going about it in bit more thoughtful manner.
Designing something that appeals to 13 yr olds and younger doesn't mean excluding older people. The original EPCOT was cleverly desgned to appeal to a wide range, for the whole family. Families include people of all ages. They should be thinking about how they can appeal to all ages, not just 13-yr olds and younger.I know we all like to say Disney is for the young and the young at heart, but you do know the parks are primarily for that first part, right? Outside of the fanatics there aren't many regular people planning WDW trips that don't revolve around their kids. I would hope they are thinking about how they can appeal to a 13 year old when designing things.
Not exactly, if they really wanted that one it can be done away with and used for what it was originally intended, an actual pavilion.Amen to that. I believe they originally had 19 plots for countries. However, they've used up two of those to expand Norway / Frozen and to expand France with the Ratatouille ride. Six spots remain (including where the once planned Africa pavilion became only a refreshment spot). I'd love to see India, Greece, and Brazil for starters.
Connections serves:Where else can we get one near there? Or is walking one over from World Showcase the only option?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.