Virtual Toad
Well-Known Member
Agreed, though the long telephoto picture does compress the depth. But the crowd flow concerns are definitely valid.It looks really… visually busy. Also kinda looks like a crowd flow nightmare.
On the whole, it seems more like a capitulation than a cohesive concept. Not sure what the message is supposed to be, other than "trees are good." Which is fine (I happen to love trees), but I can see literally the same thing in almost any modern urban core or suburban park.
Which is why I call it capitulation. Instead of wowing us, knocking our socks off, exciting us about the endless possibilities for the future and/or the joy of discovery (or whatever the theme is now supposed to be), we get... trees. Safe, value-engineered (despite the cost) and relatively easy to maintain. Almost a "set it and forget it" mentality. Or a simple in-fill, returning the space to nature, because they couldn't come up with anything better.
Is it nice? Sure. Is it worthy of its location in Epcot? For me, that remains an open question.