osian
Well-Known Member
It was only my opinion too. I'm sorry that you couldn't accept my opinion. And I didn't call anyone selfish, I specifically said that I'm not selfish.The post you are replying to is just stating their opinion. They’re not saying anything personal about the people who like the attraction.
If you love it, that’s great! I also happen to think that it isn’t a very worthy attraction of EPCOT and I’d personally applaud its removal. Especially with what it replaced. But in today’s day and age, it would be filled with IP. So it’s IP-less existence is something I appreciate about it.
But to call someone selfish for expressing a simple opinion is a bit much.
I think your opinion on it is more reasonable though, you're thinking more about the integrity of the park, although I personally feel there are even less worthy attractions there that could be looked at first. And indeed while it is there, it is blocking IP, and that we should be grateful for. I think MS is a brilliant demonstration of the experience of travelling into space for the purposes of exploration and maybe even living up there or on other planets (though the ride as it stands is literally about training for that) and as such does work in Epcot. I like the idea of it being part of an expanded space pavilion, Horizons-esque, where it could be the thrill element of a multi-element pavilion, an exposition of how we could live in the future. Space 220 is already another element. I just don't think "(my opinion is that) it should be removed because I get sick on it" is a particularly well-argued point. Especially as we should be looking towards additions, not replacements, and using what is currently abandoned.
Last edited: