Avengers Campus - Reactions / Reviews

[Jiggsawpuzzle35]

Wow that ride seemed totally underwhelming. I feel like I want my money back even though I didn’t pay an admission fee to get in. I hope Spider-Man won’t be like that. Maybe they should have added some animatronics and have the ride vehicles jerk around along with the surrounding scenes.

 

[Bongocrab88]

Wow that ride seemed totally underwhelming. I feel like I want my money back even though I didn’t pay an admission fee to get in. I hope Spider-Man won’t be like that. Maybe they should have added some animatronics and have the ride vehicles jerk around along with the surrounding scenes.

The entire ride seemed to have zero movement from any of the targets or variation. Really disappointing.

 

[Mac Tonight]

Look away!! Look away!!!! DCA will be better! Promise.

 

[mickEblu]

Marvel isn’t a slam dunk theme park property like Star Wars or Harry Potter. Not to say great attractions can’t be made using Marvel IP but they obviously haven’t figured it out yet.

EDIT: We also haven’t seen a purpose built Marvel attraction yet so...

 

[mickEblu]

I mean their is obviously a disconnect with the ride system and the IP. Slow moving omnimover with a battle /comic book action movie IP? Makes a lot of sense. Seamless

 

[mickEblu]

That was terrible. Are you sure that one wasn't in Dubi? Did they take a preexisting Buzz Lightyear ride and gut it and make it even worst? No joystick to spin the pod.

Wow. Just finished the video. Absolutely terrible.

 

[Touchdown]

I still question using Spider-man as their choice, mainly because there is already a nearly perfect ride with him already at IOA. Let’s hope they improve this greatly from Ant Man

 

[truecoat]

Marvel isn’t a slam dunk theme park property like Star Wars or Harry Potter. Not to say great attractions can’t be made using Marvel IP but they obviously haven’t figured it out yet.

EDIT: We also haven’t seen a purpose built Marvel attraction yet so...

I have to disagree with this.

 

[mickEblu]

I have to disagree with this.

Eloquently put

 

[truecoat]

Eloquently put

It seems such an odd statement to say it's not a slam dunk, what's your reasoning?

 

[mickEblu]

It seems such an odd statement to say it's not a slam dunk, what's your reasoning?

Oh so you just “disagree” to a post that had 3 diffferent thoughts on it and answer a question with a question. No I’m good.

 

[PymParty]

EDIT: We also haven’t seen a purpose built Marvel attraction yet so...

Iron Man experience at Hong Kong Disneyland was purpose built

 

[mickEblu]

Iron Man experience at Hong Kong Disneyland was purpose built

Forgot about that as it also underwhelmed me.

Welp....how about we haven’t seen a purpose built Marvel attraction that’s not a simple simulator from the 80s?

 

[SSG]

Iron Man experience at Hong Kong Disneyland was purpose built

Yes. I've often looked at that and said 'They built that on purpose?'

 

[mickEblu]

Yes. I've often looked at that and said 'They built that on purpose?'

LOL

 

[PymParty]

Yes. I've often looked at that and said 'They built that on purpose?'

It went into the plot reserved for Star Tours, they just changed the theme to Marvel to have it exclusive to HK

 

[mickEblu]

It went into the plot reserved for Star Tours, they just changed the theme to Marvel to have it exclusive to HK

Hmmm if this is the case then even though it’s technically a purpose built attraction their needs to be a HUGE asterisk next to purpose built.

 

[SSG]

Hmmm if this is the case then even though it’s technically a purpose built attraction their needs to be a HUGE asterisk next to purpose built.

I get what you mean but building started in 2015 and this was reportedly a couple generations newer version of the Star Tours simulator. That edges it to purpose-built for me.

Still underwhelming though.

 

[mickEblu]

I get what you mean but building started in 2015 and this was reportedly a couple generations newer version of the Star Tours simulator. That edges it to purpose-built for me.

Still underwhelming though.

It’s defintley a gray area. They were confined to the space of a simulator attraction which means they were restricted with their options. (At DL Star Tours take up like one acre, not sure about iron Man) So in reality I would still consider the Guardians coaster at Epcot to be the first true purpose built Marvel attraction in the complete sense of the phrase.

 

[Disney Irish]

It’s defintley a gray area. They were confined to the space of a simulator attraction which means they were restricted with their options. (At DL Star Tours take up like one acre, not sure about iron Man) So in reality I would still consider the Guardians coaster at Epcot to be the first true purpose built Marvel attraction in the complete sense of the definition.

I would agree with this. Once that opens I think we'll have a true sense of what they can do with Marvel in the parks.