What's wrong with that? I think it looks fine and is thematically accurate.
But they look good in that picture becuase, for the most part, there are a lot of them together. The twigvines come down in bunches, and narrow as they get further away. To me, it gives the appearance that, while the vines are being pulled down, the mountains are resisting gravity and therefore floating.
In the land at DAK, the vine is thicker than any other and away from the rest of the group. I just find it odd for there to be a large bunch of generally short vines, and then all alone, off to the side, a really long and thick one. It doesn't work for me.
It works for you, and that's good. I'm not trying to convince you that it looks bad, I just wanted to give my quick reasoning. We've also yet to see the full land, much less in person, so perhaps I'll change my mind. Perhaps it looks better from another angle. Hey, perhaps I just don't like Pandora.
I thought that was hiding a support...
I'm not sure. No vine or support was there until they started adding details to the larger mountain below it, so if it were a support, I think we would've seen it when they put up that mountain originally. I also believe that mountain was built, painted, and detailed somewhere else, and then placed there. I'm no expert on construction though.
View attachment 167799
We passed the three year anniversary for Star Wars Land alittle while back when Disney announced it at the D23 with the name a Orange Harvest. We are looking at another project trying six to seven years from announcement to finished product.
I'd hardly consider that an announcement. That was nothing more than a tease, and in fact, a tease for a Star Wars Land concept that got trashed. SWL was almost completely redesigned over the following two years, and then they made an actual announcement at D23 2015.
I'm going to consider August 2015 the announcement date.
