I actually take it to mean it could be a new Avatar land with offerings different to the Animal Kingdom one. But maybe I'm just on hopium.Bob just mentioned this on the Morgan Stanley call.
"We have an Avatar land in Florida, and we are bringing one to Disneyland".
Really sounds like we are getting the full land, or something like it.
It will probably just be Na'vi River Journey.
But shorter.It will probably just be Na'vi River Journey.
I know this is probaby a joke, but Navi River Journey is actually a lot closer to what many people here profess to want when compared to what Disney's actually been building over the past few decades. They could do a lot worse than put in a buffed-up, expanded NRJ with more animatronics and a greater sense of payoff. I imagine it also would have a more manageble wait time at either of the DLR parks than it does at DAK because ride capacity's higher across the board over here.It will probably just be Na'vi River Journey.
I'm still advocating that an Avatar area should be reimagined as an entirely indoor land. Foliage, sound, scent and most importantly light could all be controlled. I'd rather visit a Pandora that was in a permanent evening state.i kinda like how avatarland is exclusive to AK in the states.....I love Avatar land but really like parks having different options
I found this intriguing too, but wonder if this confirms the land going onto existing property.Bob may be counting on the land expansion going through in Anaheim
Micechat indicated from their sources that Pandora was going into DCA taking over the backlot portion Hollywoodland and obviously expanding into the transportation hub. It makes sense that Disney wants to replace this troubled remaining area of DCA 1.0 before they touch the Simba lot for DCA expansion.I found this intriguing too, but wonder if this confirms the land going onto existing property.
I would take anything said on that site with a grain of salt. While it make sense for it to go into the Backlot, it reads as speculation on Dusty's part, not directly from a source.Micechat indicated from their sources that Pandora was going into DCA taking over the backlot portion Hollywoodland and obviously expanding into the transportation hub. It makes sense that Disney wants to replace this troubled remaining area of DCA 1.0 before they touch the Simba lot for DCA expansion.
The floating mountains would look horrible from the Esplanade, and I suspect they'd be visible from within parts of Disneyland if they were built on the Hollywood backlot.Micechat indicated from their sources that Pandora was going into DCA taking over the backlot portion Hollywoodland and obviously expanding into the transportation hub. It makes sense that Disney wants to replace this troubled remaining area of DCA 1.0 before they touch the Simba lot for DCA expansion.
Maybe it will be a different version of the land where visible mountains seen in DL or the Esplanade would not be an issue. Or maybe it goes in the Simba lot instead.The floating mountains would look horrible from the Esplanade, and I suspect they'd be visible from within parts of Disneyland if they were built on the Hollywood backlot.
Yeah it’s got to be something different. I doubt it’ll be outside of the existing footprint since Iger keeps saying it’s happening and Forward hasn’t been given the green light yetMaybe it will be a different version of the land where visible mountains seen in DL or the Esplanade would not be an issue. Or maybe it goes in the Simba lot instead.
Yeah it’s got to be something different. I doubt it’ll be outside of the existing footprint since Iger keeps saying it’s happening and Forward hasn’t been given the green light yet
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.