PorterRedkey
Well-Known Member
I would give anything to be a fly on the wall / discharge manhole in the ground, during this construction.
im thinking they want to keep this project as quiet as possible or maybe Cameron does. i mean why not put the model on display which would be another attraction in DAKI figure that we give Shanghai the benefit of the doubt. Yes, it was over budget and didn't quite deliver. However, it is a viable theme park and could rake in the dough. MM+ and NextGen really doesn't have much to show for the $4.0B+ spent on it. If Disney was so NextGen, they could rig a live camera feed to show current construction on Avatar. Cheapskates.
im thinking they want to keep this project as quiet as possible or maybe Cameron does. i mean why not put the model on display which would be another attraction in DAK
Technically they did show MyMagic advancements.I figure that we give Shanghai the benefit of the doubt. Yes, it was over budget and didn't quite deliver. However, it is a viable theme park and could rake in the dough. MM+ and NextGen really doesn't have much to show for the $4.0B+ spent on it. If Disney was so NextGen, they could rig a live camera feed to show current construction on Avatar. Cheapskates.
I think...this is sarcasm?I figure that we give Shanghai the benefit of the doubt. Yes, it was over budget and didn't quite deliver.
We still doing the thanksshanghai thing? I thought we were back to blaming nextgen for all the problems at WDW. I have a hard time keeping up
I think...this is sarcasm?
make it animated.. with tons of pixie dust!i think for kicks and giggles i may go back and put together a chronological list of aerials to kind of see where we were to where we are
and GREEN... really want to make Wade mad..."make it animated.. with tons of pixie dust!
and glitter.. and the seriously important cat tax!and GREEN... really want to make Wade mad..."
A couple glasses of wine while scrolling through a mass of "too many screenz" comments can make things indecipherable...lolSarcasm wasn't well receive. Reloading sarcasmatron in three...two...one..
I always knew you were a smart one!
take it easy. getting into drinking games in some fandoms can be devastating for your liver.A couple glasses of wine while scrolling through a mass of "too many screenz" comments can make things indecipherable...lol
So speculation is that Na'vi River Journey will use the same ride system as Battle for Buccaneer Gold. Do good aerials exist of the two show buildings to compare the size? I assumed based on a traditional flume that Na'vi River Journey would be in the 4-5 minute range, but the new ride system may alter that significantly.
You're right... I'll fix it, it's battle for sunken treasuredo you mean POTC? i think battle for buccaneer gold is a virtual ride at disneyquest
So speculation is that Na'vi River Journey will use the same ride system as Battle for Sunken Treasure (Shanghai). Do good aerials exist of the two show buildings to compare the size? I assumed based on a traditional flume that Na'vi River Journey would be in the 4-5 minute range, but the new ride system may alter that significantly.
Pirates appears to be about a 3.21 acre show building, Navi River Journey, 0.6 acres.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.