FrankLapidus
Well-Known Member
Still have zero interest in anything to do with Avatar but the proposed night-time offerings look great and would really add something to the park.
The construction trailers in the field behind DAKL are very real.And on a Friday night. An old tactic for when Companies hope to bury an announcement. The art is far more conceptual than actual.
Living with the (Avatar) Land, Soarin' 2.0 over pandora, and the high cost white knuckle E Ticket.
Wowee that's even more optimistic that what @Tim_4 was saying back when everyone called him crazy.So 2 E's and a D/C right?
Agreed....but I'll take baby steps then just sittingNot yet. Epcot is still free falling faster than how long Soarin' takes to ride and DHS needs more than what's in danger of descending into a bandaid fix. Disney Springs is another attempt to fix a mess of their own creation. DAK needed this help a decade ago and it's still nowhere near complete and may just be be the minimum of what's needed. But it is a welcome addition that's sorely needed.
The upkeep and renovation at MK I saw recently needs commending (or should it if its meant to be routine) but the love and plussing in the castle park needs to be duplicated in the other three parks and fast.
People are starved for anything new, particularly in this park. When they think about it for a day or two, they will remember (as they did when the land was first announced) that it:
1. Is focused on an intellectual property with no memorable characters that has already left the cultural consciousness (unlike Star Wars or Harry Potter), and
2. Its concept has nothing to do with a park centered on Earth animals - utilizing the same logic (its about another planet and they have some animals there and it kind of looks like a jungle) they could put an Ewoks or Chewbacca attraction in Animal Kingdom and it would make sense also. It does not.
It was a panic move at a time when Disney thought it had no intellectual property that appealed to boys. Panic moves rarely work out and, further, now they have plenty of intellectual property that appeals to boys that they own outright and are more popular than Avatar (Star Wars, Marvel, Indiana Jones). Their insistence on going ahead with Avatarland in Animal Kingdom is foolish. They should have just scrapped the idea and ate the investment cost ... or built a substantially downsized attraction/mini-land in DHS where it kind of, sort of fits.
Or real plants.Looking at this concept art, yeah, they still should have tried to have gotten the Pokemon license instead. I'm happy about the nighttime content, but Avatar still looks meh and I get the feeling there's going to be a ton of plastic plants everywhere.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.