imagineer boy
Well-Known Member
Now would be a good time to move on from this idea onto something else for DAK....
Oh yes! I'm really crossing my fingers for that. :lol:
Now would be a good time to move on from this idea onto something else for DAK....
And this is what I am starting to believe may happen here... Some of our resident insiders have stated how there are those in the company that do not want Avatar in the parks and that this was forced on them by Iger and Staggs... If the idea is really that unpopular inside the halls of the Disney company, then any delay in the next 2 movies may be the excuse Iger and Staggs need to delay or eventually/quietly cancel the project...
Somewhat related, but part of the Avatar equation is the merchandising aspect. A quick informal search on Amazon's top 100 action & toy figures shows not one single Avatar toy. There were several Disney figures both Pixar and Mickey and the gang, of course a few Star Wars and even some Tangled and Smurfs action figures. Just makes me wonder, how they're going to leverage this to generate merchandise opportunities.
I think you can chalk it up to not really thinking the whole thing through.
The thing that makes properties like Star Wars, Harry Potter, Indiana Jones, etc so hugely successful is that they appeal to both children and adults. I don't see Avatar as that property. I don't see kids dressed up for Halloween as one of the aliens from it. But I still see a lot of Darth Vaders and Harry Potters.
Yes, Avatar was really successful in the theaters...but are there going to be kids begging their parents to take them to Avatarland like they did for WWoHP? So far I don't think the evidence backs that up. But if they had announced a whole Star Wars land, I really think they could have hit a home run. Both fans and not fans would have been excited.
...the delay would line up the opening of Avatarland in DAK and the third release. If Avatar 2 opens Dec 2015 and Avatar 3 in 2016 that puts them right in the line of sight of the projected opening of Avatar land. I'm willing to bet they're trying to create a tighter alignment for marketing reasons.
...but I could be wrong.
Two thoughts:
1. The longer the films take, the longer Avatar will remain "relevant" in a pop culture kinda way. An extreme example of this is how the Star Tours attraction can only benefit from the Star Wars media and merchandising that continues to be released.
.
Combine HIS attention to detail with Joe Rodhe's, and with the right budget, it IS going to be eye-popping
In that case we'll get the most special effects laden queue of all time, followed by a ride composed of black bed sheets and stilt walkers in blue body paint.
In that case we'll get the most special effects laden queue of all time, followed by a ride composed of black bed sheets and stilt walkers in blue body paint.
While I'm excited about an expansion to the Animal Kingdom, I agree with those that have speculated (WDW1974) that World of Avatar may never happen. It's so far out that there are plenty of opportunities for the deal to go bad.
Here is my thing. A lot of people are basing there opinions on how they liked the movie and thats why it shouldnt be built. But if you really looked at the overall scenery and awesome world that pandora is....you cant say you wouldnt have fun walking around in it for atleast a half hour or maybe more. I hope that what happens is the land will come out after the second and then the 3 comes out later to keep it a fresh concept and idea.
If Iger and Staggs are truly pushing this, which I believe he (Iger) is as it just fits the model that he has used since taking charge, then there's really no stopping it unless for some reason Cameron can't finish it due to other commitments. The only person(s) I could see possibly in a position high enough to derail it would be John Lasseter, Joe Rohde and maybe Tony Baxter. Otherwise, it becomes a "this is what the boss wants, and Cameron is footing the bill, so do it".
Somewhat related, but part of the Avatar equation is the merchandising aspect. A quick informal search on Amazon's top 100 action & toy figures shows not one single Avatar toy. There were several Disney figures both Pixar and Mickey and the gang, of course a few Star Wars and even some Tangled and Smurfs action figures. Just makes me wonder, how they're going to leverage this to generate merchandise opportunities.
I'm a little worried about the opposite, actually. Will people still care about Avatar in 4 years? I saw the move in the theater and I can't really recall the details to be honest. Unless the new movie is really amazing and huge and something totally new AND marketed well. I'm afraid it will be old news.
Here is my thing. A lot of people are basing there opinions on how they liked the movie and thats why it shouldnt be built. But if you really looked at the overall scenery and awesome world that pandora is....you cant say you wouldnt have fun walking around in it for atleast a half hour or maybe more. I hope that what happens is the land will come out after the second and then the 3 comes out later to keep it a fresh concept and idea.
Here we go again. Be prepared, every single Avatar thread turns into the same re-hashed arguments. "I hate the movie Disney shouldn't build a land... no it will be beautiful... it doesn't have fans... eleventy billion dollars!!!" I'm taking a hopeful wait and see approach.
I posted this in another fourm but it applys here also
Avatar a Billion Dollar movie ?
Will AK (disney) be able to build a Billion dollar park.
remember the fourms talk about the decline of Disney not wanting to spend money on yeti,light bulbs, ect. They have alot of money a billion tied up in this next gen upgrade the largest ever
so money for fl
billion for next gen
billion for AK ? to show of a billion dollar movie
thats alot of billions
from ip
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.