Endor Sightseer's opinion is neither true nor false, and neither is yours, and neither is mine. It's not necessary to preface an opinion with "in my opinion" or any other qualifier. So if we're getting technical, your claim that his opinion is outright false means you are the one in this case who has stated your opinion as fact. But this is a casual discussion forum, and no one is trying to mislead anyone.
I see your point with Star Tours, by the way. I don't at all think that what you're saying is worth any less than the other opinions here.
I completely agree that opinion is neither true or false. No one can deny somebody of their opinion (unless it could somehow be proven that they were lying about it). Call me old-fashioned, but I still think it's proper to state fact as fact, and opinion as opinion (though I've been more silent than not on the matter). Just in the last couple of days, we've seen opinion stated as fact:
“Autopia is the best attraction in Tomorrowland.”
“...it really is terrible.”
“Everything there is subpar.”
“It's swill!”
Yet, we've also seen opinion stated as opinion:
“I kinda love Autopia.”
“Autopia is one of my favorite attractions.”
“In-N-Out's fries are really good, in my opinion.”
...so we know it's possible for some people to do so. (Also, it seems to me that if a person has the time and ability to type "You know what I meant!", they might be capable of simply typing what they meant in the first place.)
The point I was making about the description of Star Tours was that I contend it was inaccurate. Read it again, and tell me if you believe it to be accurate? If that was your sole deciding factor, would you venture inside? Assuming you did, upon exiting the attraction, would you look back on the description and feel it was deceiving?
My simplified point is that in stating that "Ride A is great, but Ride B is terrible!", one is almost implying that those that enjoy Ride B are idiots with more than questionable taste. Stating "I love Ride A, but really dislike Ride B" is valid and irrefutable. If followed up with reasons for the opinion, It's an even better catalyst for discussion.
It seems perfectly clear that that some posters here like certain attractions, dislike certain attractions (or the idea of certain attractions) and really really really really like certain attractions. I can never, and will never take those opinions away from anybody. I will however continue to occasionally step in and correct statements I see as factually false.
CM #1 has his sleeves rolled up to show off a tattoo he got in some exotic port during his two year stint in the Navy or Marines. CM #2 behind him in the greasy coveralls is obviously a Marlboro Man. Disneyland USA in real life!