Attractions Built Since 2005: Have I Got This Right?

[flynnibus]

Agree to disagree...

entire descent story / scenes removed and a placebo of a screen installed on vehicles to draw attention away from the part of the story they removed, Large triangles were supposed to have projections on them but did not happen due to rushed finish and low funding

Weather or not you like the output is not relevant to the idea of the scale of the change. Nor is 'what could have been' - it's still a massive change.

 

[copcarguyp71]

Weather or not you like the output is not relevant to the idea of the scale of the change. Nor is 'what could have been' - it's still a massive change.

True...for better or worse it was massive...I digress.

 

[marni1971]

Weather or not you like the output is not relevant to the idea of the scale of the change. Nor is 'what could have been' - it's still a massive change.

It was though still a massive refurb that ran out of money.

The ascent is superb. And then you enter the "matrix" tunnel.

 

[PeterAlt]

Do articulated buses count as a ride?

Only if they play music...

 

[PeterAlt]

I guess I did. How do the additions at DL benefit someone going to WDW?

They can dream about what could be and what they are missing out on in order to make a better experience out of it...

 

[PeterAlt]

Cropping his post to fit the context of the thread (Additions since April 2005 that are "rides" and haven't been re-done)
And you put Enchanted Tiki Bar as an attraction... now I know your stance on alcohol
Do spectaculars count as rides? In that case we can add one more.

And yet another thread turns into a DL vs. WDW debate.

See, there are forces besides my own that do these type of things! Let the record show that I was not responsible!

 

[PeterAlt]

Someone already pointed out that you pointed this out... jk

Someone already pointed out that you pointed out that tree was someone pointing this out... Huh?