While I do enjoy Disneyland itself, I think comparing the two resorts in absolute terms is kind of absurd. WDW is much larger and has much more to do, with much broader entertainment offerings. You have water parks, shopping districts, zoo exhibits and aquariums, science center type activities at EPCOT... even DHS, which is the weakest of the WDW parks is superior to DCA I'd wager. So yes Disneyland is great, I've been I love it. But I definitely think size does matter when we're discussing which resort warrants more time spent within its gates... hell just traversing DAK and EPCOT makes either take up much more time than DCA.
It isn't even about which one we prefer. Although as a resort I do prefer WDW (DAK is my favorite them park, and I really can't stand DCA). It's about whether WDW takes more than twice as much time to see as DLR, which was my only original point and which I view as obviously correct for the vast majority of guests.