Bulldog1653
Active Member
TimeTrip, you have some interesting thoughts about the run to the airport. When I was there in September, someone (I think a monorail guy) mentioned something about problems with the city and other parks.
Running a monorail to the airport would be ok but of course places like Sea World feel that it gives Disney an unfair advantage. Disney basically told them, "Hey we have no problem with you having part of this. We will allow track usage to your park from the airport. All you have to do is pay for your part of it and share upkeep costs."
Now about the transfer issue. hop on/hop off can be nice but what good is it when the buses don't show up when they're supposed to? Sure, the monorail raises the same argument. How about a compromise? What if there were stations built at the hotels and one monorail handled 4 or more at a time? Capacity being what it is, I think that a move like that cold be beneficial.
As far as a perfect model, that is next to impossible. What is perfect to some is totally wrong to others.
Running a monorail to the airport would be ok but of course places like Sea World feel that it gives Disney an unfair advantage. Disney basically told them, "Hey we have no problem with you having part of this. We will allow track usage to your park from the airport. All you have to do is pay for your part of it and share upkeep costs."
Now about the transfer issue. hop on/hop off can be nice but what good is it when the buses don't show up when they're supposed to? Sure, the monorail raises the same argument. How about a compromise? What if there were stations built at the hotels and one monorail handled 4 or more at a time? Capacity being what it is, I think that a move like that cold be beneficial.
As far as a perfect model, that is next to impossible. What is perfect to some is totally wrong to others.