Well when you look at the numbers overall from 2019 (obviously pre-pandemic) Walt Disney Company had 155 million visitors to Universals 51 million worldwide. The Magic Kingdom alone had 20.9 million visitors, Universal Orlando was at 10.9 and IOA at 10.3. Putting all other factors and quality arguments aside, how reactionary should they really get based on overall draw from 2019? I think we'll have to look at the 2021 numbers but losing even a couple million from each park and the draw will still be better. They're not worried about things like this until they have a reason to be.I think WDW's reply to Epic is going to be value or free dining packages........maybe........
WDW sadly could care less.
Wasn't the DAK Project some sort of version of TDS' Mysterious Island?One for each park. Top of my head... proper Space Mountain refurb, proper Imagination refurb, Door Coaster and I can’t remember the DAK project. I discussed it at length a decade ago!
I think you have it backwards. People will always go to MK because of your first point. The goal is to get people to go elsewhere as well. One way is to adjust dynamic pricing to account for this, while the other is to add "can't miss" attractions to the other parks (SW:GE, Pandora, etc.).
Disney really upped their game when they built Pandora and Galaxy's Edge in response to Harry Potter @ Universal. But I just can't see them building a 5th theme park just because Universal is building their third.
Right, I understand that people will always go to MK, and I understand that they want to spread attendance through the other parks. I'm not disputing either of those things.
However, I'm saying that because The Magic Kingdom is (wrongly, but nonetheless) viewed as the flagship and representative of "Disney," it's important for the long-term public perception of "Disney theme parks" to make sure MK retains its standing as the best that a theme park can be - which, I would argue, it has already lost and thus should reinstate.
I don't think it's unreasonable at all, actually. Not every ride can be a mega showstopper - you need some lower quality rides to boost numbers and soak up capacity. Disney on some level realizes this - Toy Story Land wouldn't have gotten Alien Swirling Saucers (opened 2018!) otherwise.The non-MK parks currently have 9 rides each, and people in California complain that DCA is lacking attractions with 19... However, Disney's current attitude is quality over quantity, as smaller spinners and dark rides that boost overall numbers been overlooked, so it is unreasonable to expect every park to be at 20+ before a 5th park is "needed".
Bingo. Thank you.Wasn't the DAK Project some sort of version of TDS' Mysterious Island?
That was always the one I wanted to know more about . . .
That's fair. However, if we are going with the assumption that people will visit MK regardless because it is viewed as the flagship park, then it would only need minimal investment.Right, I understand that people will always go to MK, and I understand that they want to spread attendance through the other parks. I'm not disputing either of those things.
However, I'm saying that because The Magic Kingdom is (wrongly, but nonetheless) viewed as the flagship and representative of "Disney," it's important for the long-term public perception of "Disney theme parks" to make sure MK retains its standing as the best that a theme park can be - which, I would argue, it has already lost and thus should reinstate.
I agree that it should not be unreasonable, but it is simply not the direction the parks are going in. Personally, I think a ratio of about 2:1 smaller rides to E-tickets is good, but Disney has made this closer to 1:1. While this has benefited the smaller rides in that their quality is generally pretty high, it has the negative consequence of fewer overall rides and lower total capacity.I don't think it's unreasonable at all, actually. Not every ride can be a mega showstopper - you need some lower quality rides to boost numbers and soak up capacity. Disney on some level realizes this - Toy Story Land wouldn't have gotten Alien Swirling Saucers (opened 2018!) otherwise.
There are a number of names in the carnival flat ride industry and a wide catalogue of off-the-shelf C-tickets. Galaxy's Edge picking up a C-ticket Air Race that Imagineers slapped some TIE Fighter theming onto is far from the worst thing that could happen to that corner of the park, as one example that jumps to mind.
I'm not advocating that Disney turn around and buy up an entire carnival midway's worth of flat rides and bring back Mickey's Toontown Fair with them or something similarly absurd, but quietly installing the aforementioned Air Race ride and making that a footnote as part of Galaxy's Edge 2.0 now featuring the Galactic Starcruiser Experience? That sort of thing should be happening more, and it's highly unlikely that anybody would be seriously upset by it, and I don't think anybody should be upset by it.
Bingo. Thank you.
Pretty much JTTCOTE with a different monster and a 20K either a) left as an empty space for later or b) as a walk through to be turned into a ride later or c) as the ride from day one (unlikely even back then)
JTTCOTE is an overrated ride to be honest. The acceleration portion was like less than 10 seconds and it's over. The first part was great with the animatronic monster. The queue for this ride is way better like Gringotts.Bingo. Thank you.
Pretty much JTTCOTE with a different monster and a 20K either a) left as an empty space for later or b) as a walk through to be turned into a ride later or c) as the ride from day one (unlikely even back then)
Hey, at least WDW got MyMagic+ though, right??One for each park. Top of my head... proper Space Mountain refurb, proper Imagination refurb, Door Coaster and I can’t remember the DAK project. I discussed it at length a decade ago!
You don’t think people skip Epcot and go to Universal for a day or two, given the park’s current condition? I understand that it’s temporary, but…Even with Uni's additional park, Disneys still going to be able to draw the majority of people. Nothing Uni has done, even having lost the HP brand, hasnt shown Uni able to over take Disney. They may lose a day or two out of someones trip to Fla, but the majority of their days will always be Disneys, and thats making a difference.
Postponed. Work has restarted.First off, wasn't Epic Universe cancelled because of the pandemic?
Not sure if an Air Race would be the right choice but it does feel like Galaxy’s edge needs B/C tickets. There is secondary experiences for a fee (lightsaber and cantina) but no shows or small rides really.There are a number of names in the carnival flat ride industry and a wide catalogue of off-the-shelf C-tickets. Galaxy's Edge picking up a C-ticket Air Race that Imagineers slapped some TIE Fighter theming onto is far from the worst thing that could happen to that corner of the park, as one example that jumps to mind.
Sure there may be some that skip EP, again as I said Disney will lose a day or two out of peoples trips. The EP events still are bringing people in numbers that are excited about the food and drink kiosks. I stand by my comment that no matter what Uni does it will never overtake Disney as the more popular destination.You don’t think people skip Epcot and go to Universal for a day or two, given the park’s current condition? I understand that it’s temporary, but…
Postponed. Work has restarted.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.