EPCOT Announced: Mary Poppins Attraction in UK Pavilion

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
The facade of a ride is part of the ride, so it’s part of the budget

Sure, but the whole Cherry Lane facade isn't necessarily all part of the attraction's facade, especially if it's just a carousel/spinner.

Regardless, if it is all part of the same budget, then there's significantly less than $80 million available for the ride itself. Cherry Lane will be far more expensive than something like the Ratatouille facade.
 

rreading

Well-Known Member
1. Epcot Forever / HarmonioUS - the former is awful but short lived. The latter is long term, likely technologically impressive but also likely IP heavy.
2. Frozen Ever After - decent enough ride, wrong park
3. The Seas with Nemo and Friends - I have an issue with the ride, I don't have an issue with Turtle Talk. There's no effort to tie it into Epcot's themes
4. Gran Fiesta Tour - Same problems as Seas with Nemo and Friends
5. Imagination with Figment - Just an overall bad ride
6. UK Pavilion - I'm concerned Poppins won't fit
7. Cosmic Rewind's thematic fit? There are treatments that could work, but I could see them foregoing that. Not to mention the eyesore that is the building.
8. Beauty and the Beast sing a long in France
9. Play Pavilion - Doesn't seem appropriate, just an excuse to put all the characters in Epcot. I suppose that centralizing them all in one location is a good alternative to spreading characters throughout the park, but they're doing both.
10. The future of SSE - I fear they my put it in IP

I'd listen to arguments about Moana concerns as high as 9 on my list, but whatever.

I find this to be an interesting question. What are the problems with Epcot?

To me, there are not a lack of things to do. There are not a plethora of rides for kids but my children have gone annually or more since 2 years of age and at 10 and 15 they still love Epcot as much as any other theme park and will not allow us to skip it (I'll suggest it sometimes to see what they say) even in a 2-3d WDW trip.

I loved the authenticity of Maelstrom much more that the ride itself. It always beckoned with potential and then you ended up in the North Sea amongst the oil wells...so...disappointed once again. While the Frozen ride doesn't include Odin and it does include a line, I still enjoyed it more. We don't really ride it anymore since it's not worth the line for us, but still I would say it's an improved experience for those who care to experience it.

While the Rio del Tempo was definitely not perfect, I feel that it is worse with the birds. Would definitely prefer a redo.

Imagination is a mess. Besides Energy - which needed something - it's the worst situation in Epcot. Hopefully they hearken back to its distant past which was amazing.

Loved Horizons and WOM as well as the Living Seas of the past but never really clicked with Innoventions nor CommuniCore so I'm not really going to miss them. If they can create a lovely, beckoning environment around a WELL DONE renovation of SSE then I will be happy. Fix Imagination and put the Pixar movie into Mexico then I'll be pretty happy.

Then they can reimagineer The Living Seas. That would be icing on the cake.

Regarding themes, I suppose that Epcot's current direction is a celebration of the culture of mankind. From its evolution in SSE to its manifestations of exploration and civilizations. HS is the world of movies. AK is the world of humans/animals and mankind in nature. And MK is somewhat a hodgepodge but is mostly our world of fantasy. But Epcot seems to represent the way in which our human culture participates in its world.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
My expectation is indoor carousel with some sort of screen/visual component. I hope it's more than this, but that's my expectation.
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
I’ve always wanted to see a ride with a storyline where the oppressed carousel horses break free from the carousel! It would load and start out in carousel form and go around a couple times, but on a certain rotation, the horses would travel off of the carousel and into dark ride mode, roaming freely at last, but not without trouble! It would be fantastic. Guarantee guests would love it.

Obviously this isn’t what we’re getting, but I do hope that if a carousel indeed comes, it’s more than an amusement park ride.
 

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
I’m still excited for this project. I love Poppins and with a little bit of that poppins twist could be fun...I just hope it has some cool tech, would really love to be in that world. I’m just happy we are getting cherry tree lane at least. Loved returns.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Yes it is.
It’s the facade of the show building and queue building

You have no way of knowing if that's true or not until we know what's actually being built. Disney apparently doesn't even know yet.

Regardless, it's irrelevant. That really has nothing to do with my point. I'll repeat it -- there's significantly less than $80 million available for the ride itself, because building out Cherry Lane to look exactly like the movie will be more expensive than building, for example, a random Parisian building facade for Ratatouille.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
Didnt the FEA remodel cost upwards of 120 million and they were starting with an existing attraction already in place? I know they added a section of track, a facade remodel and a new Queue...but it was not a Ground Up construction project like this would be... So I am noot expecting much...though it is probably more than it cost to build Future World back in the late 70s...lol
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
Didnt the FEA remodel cost upwards of 120 million and they were starting with an existing attraction already in place? I know they added a section of track, a facade remodel and a new Queue...but it was not a Ground Up construction project like this would be... So I am noot expecting much...though it is probably more than it cost to build Future World back in the late 70s...lol
I thought FEA was closer to 75
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
Didnt the FEA remodel cost upwards of 120 million and they were starting with an existing attraction already in place? I know they added a section of track, a facade remodel and a new Queue...but it was not a Ground Up construction project like this would be... So I am noot expecting much...though it is probably more than it cost to build Future World back in the late 70s...lol

It's possible it was more expensive to remodel Maelstrom into FEA than it would have been to build FEA from scratch. That's probably not the case since they were able to use the same ride system etc. but it's not unusual for a full remodel of an existing structure to cost more than starting from scratch.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
It's possible it was more expensive to remodel Maelstrom into FEA than it would have been to build FEA from scratch. That's probably not the case since they were able to use the same ride system etc. but it's not unusual for a full remodel of an existing structure to cost more than starting from scratch.
I agree it usually is...and FEA was elaborate with their use of animatronics and special effects...Not sure they could do a new build of FEA for 80 million though...I think it would be well over the hundred mark based on their recent attraction costs...
Mary Poppins attraction would have to include a meet and greet, new buildings and new facades, none of will will be inexpensive... I am hopping it will be more than just a standard carousel with Mary themed decor and a meet and greet though...
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom