AdventureHasAName
Well-Known Member
This isn't really what Eisner did. After the completion of EPCOT Center in 1982, Eisner became infatuated with getting guests on-property and then never having them leave during their entire vacation. So every time a competitor entered the Central Florida area, Eisner immediately moved to counter them with a substitute on-property.If it wasn't for DAK I'd rarely visit Walt Disney World. I live in Europe so have DLP for Magic Kingdom, Epcot I don't like (and Europa Park does the country themed park much better) and Hollywood Studio's except for Rise is either covered at DLP or I'm not bothered about.
I think this all goes back to the Eisner era of diversifying the parks to appeal to different markets but having them on one resort so everyone will visit them all and have their favourites. Nowadays MK/Epcot/DHS are becoming more and more alike with Epcot doing it badly and DHS not being able to handle the demand. I fear DAK is going to go down this path and become WDW's fourth Magic Kingdom... and when that happens I'll no longer need to visit WDW and I can sell my AKL DVC.
Church Street Station resulted in Pleasure Island
Universal Orlando resulted in Disney MGM Studios
Wet & Wild resulted in Typhoon Lagoon and Blizzard Beach
Busch Gardens Tampa resulted in Animal Kingdom
Eisner wasn't doing it to diversify the parks; he did it to neutralize the competition.