In many cases this is already happening. The system identifies the problem. It just takes people to react.Now that machine learning is a more mature technology, it's probably time for Disney to automate some of their show quality monitoring.
I suppose it is possible, but, I'm not able to accept that answer.
Nope, that would be the dumbest thing possible and although I don't think they are necessarily the brightest bulbs on the tree, they are not that stupid and if they are, then Disney deserves to go into the toilet and the sooner the better. Anything that gets the attention of the public and the word of mouth machine this negatively is the world ending. That is why I continue to believe that there is more to this story.Well, accept it. Management in operations is notorious for valuing efficiency above all other aspects and e-stop situations are essentially reserved exclusively for when somebody is dying. And sometimes not even then. Anything that reduces overall throughput is looked at like the world is ending.
Nope, that would be the dumbest thing possible and although I don't think they are necessarily the brightest bulbs on the tree, they are not that stupid and if they are
Cast are generally not authorized to take an attraction down on their own for a show concern. Safety, yes. Show? They need to go through a leader and it would be their call. I believe the OP said the show was eventually stopped. This was probably the length of time it took to notify and receive a response from the leader.Nope, that would be the dumbest thing possible and although I don't think they are necessarily the brightest bulbs on the tree, they are not that stupid and if they are, then Disney deserves to go into the toilet and the sooner the better. Anything that gets the attention of the public and the word of mouth machine this negatively is the world ending. That is why I continue to believe that there is more to this story.
louder for the people in the backThis 100%. I can imagine some middle level manager chewing out this CM for stopping a show and making the manager have to deal with guest complaints over something as "trivial" as "good show".
In many cases this is already happening. The system identifies the problem. It just takes people to react.
Many attractions show control systems will report faults with certain show elements.
Some attractions already use cameras monitoring some animation as well as a variety of other methods to identify and alert operations and maintenance of potential show concerns.True. But this particular fault was with the projection system. My point is that they now could point a camera at the stage and have a secondary system literally just watch the whole show, much like a guest would, and return a percentage assessment based on how numerically close it thought the current show was to a trained "ideal."
Additionally, I think it is foolish to put operations in charge of show quality E-stops. Their department literally gets paid to prioritize capacity over show. It's no surprise that this has resulted in an environment where operators are hesitant to stop a clearly malfunctioning show; fearing reprisal just for doing an effective job.
Some attractions already use cameras monitoring some animation as well as a variety of other methods to identify and alert operations and maintenance of potential show concerns.
The problem with someone other than operations being in charge is that operations is the only one actually present at the attractions on a constant basis.
While it is true they have been using cameras and a variety of sensors for a very long time, my point was that they show quality process could be automated to a point where a human's assessment is no longer necessary. They are not doing this currently.
That would certainly be beyond the current process. As a guest/Disney fan I think this would be great for maintaining proper show quality. However I can’t see them ever going through with something like this. Removing the ability for operations to make the judgement based on operational considerations will likely never happen.
Also, ops will always have the ability to stops shows for other priorities such as safety.
It would have to allow ops the ability to continue operating an attraction despite the system identify show concerns... Unfortunately
Unfortunately it’s not that simple.If only Disney had some overriding keys to ensuring quality guest experience that management could use. You know like Safety, Courtesy, Show, and Efficiency. Listed in the order of most importance of course.
Yes quarterly earnings doesn’t have the same ring to it.Unfortunately it’s not that simple.
The keys are supposed to trump the others in succession: 1. Safety, above all else. All three other keys can be dropped in the name of safety. 2. Courtesy - guest service should come before everything except safety) 3. Show 4. Efficiency (show should never be sacrificed for efficiency) It gets complicated when some Disney leaders interpret it differently.Unfortunately it’s not that simple.
The keys are supposed to trump the others in succession: 1. Safety, above all else. All three other keys can be dropped in the name of safety. 2. Courtesy - guest service should come before everything except safety) 3. Show 4. Efficiency (show should never be sacrificed for efficiency) It gets complicated when some Disney leaders interpret it differently.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.