BuzzedPotatoHead89
Well-Known Member
A lawsuit like this one which is a standard contract suit should be easier for Cedar Fair lawyers to defend then god forbid someone getting severely injured or worse in a melee at the park that was planned in advance by unruly teens via social media and had the footprint online to demonstrate intentionality.That's not going to prevent a lawsuit. If they were sold the pass with the promise that they could use it on Saturdays, and now they can not, that's a problem for Knott's. It's not all that different from the shadow block-out dates that got Disneyland sued.
Knott's is perfectly within their right to change the rules midway thru the contract, but they should offer refunds automatically for those now unable to use the pass. Of course it could just be that they are assuming those teens won't bother to sue, and will hopefully re-up and re-new next year when Knott's quietly discontinues the chaperone policy.
If the park had not got a handle on this and these types of breakdowns had continued there would likely have been suits by individuals placed in harms way at the park, if not security guards for unsafe work environment, etc.
Is Knott’s refusing to offer pro-rated refunds to individuals who raise objections to this policy? I haven’t seen evidence of that but I would think they’d have no objection to doing so anyway as it’s a relatively small price to pay.