There seems to be an overall positive reaction to Mater, and an overall negative reaction to this one.
Is it just because this was hyped as a higher-tier attraction than it really is, while Mater is viewed as a minor diversion in a land that focuses on a major e-ticket?
Or could this attraction actually have some kind of substantive difference, like actually being slower? Or, as
@britain suggested, is it just something like the roof, or music, or lighting package, or even just the general aesthetic?
EDIT: My question was answered above.
Is there any evidence that Mater really is wilder, or is it just our imaginations?