We didn't really get to see what he did. I wonder if he actually did something today that warranted a ban, or if they really banned him based on things he did years ago. Or both? And who is in charge of approving such measures?
He brings free publicity to the parks, and 287,000 subscribers is no small number. With his Universal ban, he'll just have to spend more time at their competitors' parks and resorts. I'm sure Universal loves the thought of that.
Which is why I imagine his ban will be rectified. If it isn't, that's Universal's loss, IMO.