What does that have to do with anything? If you are talking profits, here is the link:Ahem, Alphabet
http://fortune.com/2016/06/08/fortune-500-most-profitable-companies-2016/
Apple is number 1. Alphabet is number 8.
What does that have to do with anything? If you are talking profits, here is the link:Ahem, Alphabet
More people have more Android phones GLOBALLY. There are a lot of people in the world that can't afford a $650 iPhone or even a $200 Android. Android has more devices at wide-ranging price points for people in India, South America, or Africa, etc. In developed countries you'll find that Apple has a fairly strong lead over Android.Actually, that's a misconception fostered by Apple. More people own Android devices than Apple. However, more people own Apple than Samsung. More own Apple than Windows phones. It's already been stated by the media that Apple phones have more broken screens than any other manufacturer.
Incorrect.More people have more Android phones GLOBALLY. There are a lot of people in the world that can't afford a $650 iPhone or even a $200 Android. Android has more devices at wide-ranging price points for people in India, South America, or Africa, etc. In developed countries you'll find that Apple has a fairly strong lead over Android.
This was taken just before a refresh cycle, the data is in Android's favor. Stil, my only point is that those who have the money tend to buy iPhones. A simple look at Google Play vs App Store revenues/downloads will tell you that.
Wrong again.This was taken just before a refresh cycle, the data is in Android's favor. Stil, my only point is that those who have the money tend to buy iPhones. A simple look at Google Play vs App Store revenues/downloads will tell you that.
That's why I said revenues/downloads. That's a ratio for you. Further, Apple doesn't set the price and neither does Google. The developers do and they always charge the same amount across platforms for the same app. What it tells us is that consumers with a higher disposable income tend to purchase Apple devices. This has been quantified and studied by a number of research institutions, and all have found that to be the case.Wrong again.
While the App store does make more revenue that Google play, Google play has more downloads. The number of downloads is a much more accurate measure of who is using what OS.
All more revenue with less products sold tells us is that Apple is charging more for a similar product.
http://9to5mac.com/2016/01/20/app-store-ios-downloads-vs-android-revenue/
It still does not change the fact that there are more Andriod devices in the US and other "developed" countries than there are iOS devices which was where this entire thing started.That's why I said revenues/downloads. That's a ratio for you. Further, Apple doesn't set the price and neither does Google. The developers do and they always charge the same amount across platforms for the same app. What it tells us is that consumers with a higher disposable income tend to purchase Apple devices. This has been quantified and studied by a number of research institutions, and all have found that to be the case.
More people have more Android phones GLOBALLY. There are a lot of people in the world that can't afford a $650 iPhone or even a $200 Android. Android has more devices at wide-ranging price points for people in India, South America, or Africa, etc. In developed countries you'll find that Apple has a fairly strong lead over Android.
I concede that that accusation was rooted in earlier statistics. The smartphone battle has followed the same path as Mac (macOS) vs PC (Windows). Apple is the single largest OEM (Smartphones) by quite a large margin, however the fact that the rest of the OEMs use Android and Apple can't maintain a 50+% market share due the the highly competitive nature of this market means that an OS used by 1 company can't possibly be higher than one used by hundreds. This is similar to a comparison between Volkswagen (Android) and Ferrari(iOS). Volkswagen makes VW Beetles, they also make Bugatti. Ferrari makes Ferrari, that's it. Obviously VW has a higher market share, but that's not exactly a fair comparison.It still does not change the fact that there are more Andriod devices in the US and other "developed" countries than there are iOS devices which was where this entire thing started.
Can you show me data on more than one developed country having more iOS devices than Android?
Who cares. It's a phone. It's great until you drop it in the toilet. Then it doesn't matter if it's an Apple or Android, unless you have one of those waterproof cases you are out of luck - literally
Yeah, about that.... http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36763932Or if you have a Galaxy S7 Active.
Yeah, about that.... http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36763932
And I am on my 4th Galaxy generation of phones, I am a fan, but no, even the S7 Active likely won't survive a trip through the loo.
Higher than market rents and a cut of revenue were probably far bigger issues. Apple could have pursued a pad where the build everything like The Edison, Walt's, STK, Planet Hollywood or Coca-Cola if they were very concerned about the architecture.I've always assumed that both Apple and Disney were game to hammer out a deal, but Apple has been doubling down on their stores exhibiting "unique" architecture. Disney probably told them they would be restricted in exterior design to fit in with the larger architectural themes of DS and Apple told them to pound sand.
Apple was interested in Disney Springs so hypothesizing why it wouldn't make sense is pointless. Apple would not be the first brand represented nearby, including a couple who are literally across I-4. You also completely ignored international visitors interested in purchasing goods at lower prices.Honestly I can't see an Apple Store opening at Disney Springs for these reasons.
There is already 2 Apple Stores in the Orlando area at the Florida Mall and The Mall at Millenia. So why would any Orlando locals want to drive into WDW to visit one?
Assuming Orlando locals would not want to go there what use would it be for the tourists who visit WDW? The only thing I can think of is if they accidently drop their iPhones and crack the screen, so they need to get it replaced and it's a lot easier than going to their locations I already mentioned.
Finally WDW already sells their own designed iPhone cases at virtually all their own stores across WDW property, so would Apple even sell them at their own store in Disney Springs?
Honestly I can't see an Apple Store opening at Disney Springs for these reasons.
There is already 2 Apple Stores in the Orlando area at the Florida Mall and The Mall at Millenia. So why would any Orlando locals want to drive into WDW to visit one?
Assuming Orlando locals would not want to go there what use would it be for the tourists who visit WDW? The only thing I can think of is if they accidently drop their iPhones and crack the screen, so they need to get it replaced and it's a lot easier than going to their locations I already mentioned.
Finally WDW already sells their own designed iPhone cases at virtually all their own stores across WDW property, so would Apple even sell them at their own store in Disney Springs?
I can think of about 200,000 reasons why one would work.Honestly I can't see an Apple Store opening at Disney Springs for these reasons.
There is already 2 Apple Stores in the Orlando area at the Florida Mall and The Mall at Millenia. So why would any Orlando locals want to drive into WDW to visit one?
Assuming Orlando locals would not want to go there what use would it be for the tourists who visit WDW? The only thing I can think of is if they accidently drop their iPhones and crack the screen, so they need to get it replaced and it's a lot easier than going to their locations I already mentioned.
Finally WDW already sells their own designed iPhone cases at virtually all their own stores across WDW property, so would Apple even sell them at their own store in Disney Springs?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.