TabulaRasa
Well-Known Member
My apologies. When you were listing off the items I assumed you missed it when you wrote 'Dunno'.I know. I take what he says very seriously. I read what he said.
My apologies. When you were listing off the items I assumed you missed it when you wrote 'Dunno'.I know. I take what he says very seriously. I read what he said.
My apologies. When you were listing off the items I assumed you missed it when you wrote 'Dunno'.
http://thedisneyblog.com/2015/07/13/teaser-trailer-for-shanghai-disneyland-pirates-of-the-caribbean/
The Disneyblog has a different shanghai video than the one posted by Spirit. This showcases some of the Pirates stuff we have seen before. I wonder if they are planning on releasing a video for each land?
Well I'm by no means a fan of having to book sixty days in advance or the three limit, or the one park limit, but it does make certain things easier mainly what I mentioned.Wait times can be added to an application. Legacy Fastpass had its flaws but it didn't punish you for not using it.
Well I'm by no means a fan of having to book sixty days in advance or the three limit, or the one park limit, but it does make certain things easier mainly what I mentioned.
An there's the entire MM+ debate in fifty words or less. If you're a planner, thumbs up. If you're not, thumbs down. Disney's internal data seems to have told them that the former outnumber the latter (or that they're more profitable at least).Yes and no… It certainly takes the fun out of going to Disney and then figuring out what you're going to do once you get there…
I suppose it's fine if you're somebody who enjoys planning and scheduling things.
An there's the entire MM+ debate in fifty words or less. If you're a planner, thumbs up. If you're not, thumbs down. Disney's internal data seems to have told them that the former outnumber the latter (or that they're more profitable at least).
well taking Disneyland Paris for example, I knew I wanted fastpasses for a few rides, however not being familiar with the park and it being my first time there, I wondered around a little bit before finding the fastpasses/ attractions and the times were considerably late in the day, in Florida I had no problem running to a place to get an "early" fastpass, but booking via my phone takes away the stress of running to the attraction.Yes and no… It certainly takes the fun out of going to Disney and then figuring out what you're going to do once you get there…
I suppose it's fine if you're somebody who enjoys planning and scheduling things.
If they were too lazy to preplan before, why should they now?Not to derail the thread, but I've met multiple 'first timers' who really felt adrift when they didn't plan. Missed a bunch,
felt harried, and felt like they were being told to have a Magical Day but didn't know how to do it. Complaints--lines,
not knowing where things were, etc.
I think Disney's data told them they were angering first timers, and that they needed to IMPOSE planning.
I am certain these people--and I have spoken with several--would have loved MM+ and had a better vacation
because of it.
An there's the entire MM+ debate in fifty words or less. If you're a planner, thumbs up. If you're not, thumbs down. Disney's internal data seems to have told them that the former outnumber the latter (or that they're more profitable at least).
Does it, though? Dining, absolutely. But most attractions run consistenly open-to-close pretty independently of whatever the guests do.Well yeah. It helps them schedule cast & staffing.
If they were too lazy to preplan before, why should they now?
I think ignorance was a bigger problem than laziness. Guests saying "I had no idea that WDW took so much planning" rather than "I know WDW takes a lot of planning but I'm not going to bother."If they were too lazy to preplan before, why should they now?
Neither do I but that's a conscious decision I make. Even when I go to Tokyo my preplanning consists of making 2 restaurant reservations and picking my park days when I buy my tickets. If I don't have a good time, that's on me, no one elseI don't see it as lazy, I just don't plan out my vacations to that degree. I have general ideas of what I want to do and specific things on my agenda, but I'm not going to schedule them out to the minute degree...
yeah I actually helped a colleague of mine and he had no idea what MM+ or FP+ was....he actually liked it once he kind of figured it out but he would ve been lost without my help..im sure many others feel that wayI think ignorance was a bigger problem than laziness. Guests saying "I had no idea that WDW took so much planning" rather than "I know WDW takes a lot of planning but I'm not going to bother."
I think ignorance was a bigger problem than laziness. Guests saying "I had no idea that WDW took so much planning" rather than "I know WDW takes a lot of planning but I'm not going to bother."
Exactly. They had no idea what they were getting into. To us, that seems, well, misguided, but
the point is this--Disney was being held responsible, in their minds, for not "guiding" them more.
After their trip, these are the people who go "never again, I hate that place"--it's their fault, but
you can't ever turn them after that. Once you've stood in an hour and a half line to meet a princess
in sweltering heat with crying babies and stubbed your toe on a stroller, you've made up your mind.
I think--for this reason only---MM+ is helping. We have to understand we, the obsessive planners
and Disney fans, are the tiny, tiny minority. WDW is SO busy these days, as we've said, there's
almost no off season any more, they had to do something or risk the complaints rising . . .
(Again, personally, I'm with "all y'all" as far as MM+ goes, but I get how it is helping in some ways.)
Which, frankly, is going to be the primary driver of growth going forward. The parks are jam packed. Attendance isn't the place to grow. Room nights are.All this planning can only be done if you bought a package… it's really an incentive to stay on property.
What I mean is the people that come down to Orlando or Tampa to see grandma and then decide they're going to take the kids to Disney for a day and then take the kids to Universal for a day… People like that are horribly penalized. People who stay off property and only come for a day or two don't have the ability to schedule a fast pass six months in advance.
This is just for planners Who stay on property… if you're off property guest you're kind of screwed.
FP for me is only useful for when there is a "must do at all cost" ride during a visit trip.Not to derail the thread, but I've met multiple 'first timers' who really felt adrift when they didn't plan. Missed a bunch,
felt harried, and felt like they were being told to have a Magical Day but didn't know how to do it. Complaints--lines,
not knowing where things were, etc.
I think Disney's data told them they were angering first timers, and that they needed to IMPOSE planning.
I am certain these people--and I have spoken with several--would have loved MM+ and had a better vacation
because of it.
Even spontaneous users have a few "must do" attractions. And, in theory, they're able to be more spontaneous with their other experiences if the "must dos" are taken care of.FP for me is only useful for when there is a "must do at all cost" ride during a visit trip.
Specially on busy days.
Apart from that? nope.. doesn't help spontaneous users at all, neither if you have tight schedules (or the other attractions are full to the seams that by the time you're halfway in the standby line.. your next fastpass as triggered).
for some people.. FP+ can be more of a punishment than a plus.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.