A Spirited Dirty Dozen ...

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
No, the original poster compared the cost of a WDW stay to a trip to Europe. Luv is the one who tried to compare the trips themselves to theme parks.

And flights from Orlando to Bora Bora in mid-November will run you $3009, per Expedia two minutes ago.

Why would anyone other than a local do that, JFK is about 1,500-1,800 for well known airlines down to 491.50 for the iffy code shares
upload_2016-10-25_7-49-22.png
 

HauntedMansionFLA

Well-Known Member
I agree with this. It was Universal's decision to up their quality combined with the purchase of the Harry Potter rights which has led to their parks being on par with Disney's parks in the market. There seems to be an idea out there that somehow Disney could have prevented Universal from competing by investing more at WDW. My opinion is that the only thing that could have severely limited Universal's success would have been buying those Harry Potter rights. Universal still would have had the opportunity to raise the bar without Potter but that single decision to buy Potter gave Uni the customer base to feel confident spending heavily on the rest of the parks.
Who actually made the call on Disney's part to not go after the HP theme park rights or had a disagreement with Rowling? What do you say to the BOD or investors when you let something like that slip out of your hands.
 

wdisney9000

Truindenashendubapreser
Premium Member
Anybody watch the new Project Veritas video in which theyre discussing Disney getting upset over the use of the Donald Duck costume by the DNC? For the record, Im not asking for, or trying to start ANY political discussion, just curious if anyone knows or has read more about Disney pressing on the legal issue of Donald Duck being used.
 

wdisney9000

Truindenashendubapreser
Premium Member
What do you say to the BOD or investors when you let something like that slip out of your hands.
Lets buy Avatar! Lets take 7 years to build it, but in the meantime, may we spend $2 billion on implementing a magic band system that ultimately forces our guests to be on their computer at midnight 60 days out from their trip so they can book a FP for a ride?
 

jakeman

Well-Known Member
How about the theme parks in Europe, like Tivoli Gardens of Denmark or Madurodam of The Netherlands, that predated and inspired Disneyland?
http://www.michaelbarrier.com/Essays/EuropeanJournal_Tivoli/europeanjournal_tivoli.htm
I've been to Tivoli Gardens and it is very nice. Landscaping puts Disney to shame in any era. I'd stop short of calling it a theme park though.

That's not a knock on Tivoli by any means and I'm not saying that a Disney park is better, it's just not what I think of when someone says "theme park".
 

wdisney9000

Truindenashendubapreser
Premium Member

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
Who actually made the call on Disney's part to not go after the HP theme park rights or had a disagreement with Rowling? What do you say to the BOD or investors when you let something like that slip out of your hands.

Unknown, I think however that the BoD just 'assumed' that they were going to get the deal as they were the only 'serious' player in town for the HP rights, They did not count on Rowling being unimpressed with being 'allowed' to pitch an idea to the almighty Disney, She at that point had already made more money than she could spend in several lifetimes AND being a creative she had a vision for what she wanted. Disney was unwilling to play on her terms so she went elsewhere.
 

DinoInstitute

Well-Known Member
Now we've got the pixie dusters claiming WDW is better than a trip to Europe?! LOL, what a great read that was over my morning coffee. Guess what? There are tons of places in this Florida swampland that are better than WDW. Just wow :eek:
Very indisputably true, it is completely ridiculous to claim a trip to WDW is better than one to Europe. Good thing that's not what @LuvtheGoof was doing. The original point, which could have been understood if people read posts instead of just doing what they find more fun in hopping on negative bandwagons, was that comparing a full trip to Europe as one to WDW is not the same thing whatsoever.
(Not to mention the fact that OP gave a pretty nice misrepresentation of a comparison between the two in the first place, but that's besides the point now).
 

asianway

Well-Known Member

Disney Analyst

Well-Known Member
The great irony in this is Disney had first crack at the Harry Potter rights, And from the stories completely blew it apparently Disney pitched 'TSMM with wands' and lots of retail and dining and Rowling was disgusted and went to Universal who agreed to build her vision (Yes Universal WAS desperate at the time but) HP showed them that they could compete with Disney on Disney's own terms and turf , Yet the takeaway from all this is once again Disney was unwilling to invest in a proper immersive environment and actual ATTRACTIONS.

For the past 10 years it's been the same story over and over Disney does not want to build attractions the ultimate expression of that was FP+ which was pitched as a way to redistribute guests to less popular attractions.


Here's something I haven't really pondered before, would Universal have ever built something like that if it wasn't for a true visionary like Rowling dictating how it went? Did she push Universal to build outside their comfort zone, and thus Universal is on hopefully a new path of immersion? I think Kong shows they can build something highly themed without an outside party guiding them, even though I'm not a big fan of the screen use I am able to admit Kong is beautifully themed.

The only thing I will say related to the end of your post, Disney is willing to build immersive environments and actual attractions (Cars Land, Avatar Land, Star Wars, overseas at TDS) ... the question is how much of the latter was a response to Universal. I believe Carsland was in development around the same time as Universal Orlando was opening Potter? Were they coincidental, or did Disney rush an immersive land once they found out what Universal was doing? Are they even related, different coasts and all?
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
Here's something I haven't really pondered before, would Universal have ever built something like that if it wasn't for a true visionary like Rowling dictating how it went? Did she push Universal to build outside their comfort zone, and thus Universal is on hopefully a new path of immersion? I think Kong shows they can build something highly themed without an outside party guiding them, even though I'm not a big fan of the screen use I am able to admit Kong is beautifully themed.

The only thing I will say related to the end of your post, Disney is willing to build immersive environments and actual attractions (Cars Land, Avatar Land, Star Wars, overseas at TDS) ... the question is how much of the latter was a response to Universal. I believe Carsland was in development around the same time as Universal Orlando was opening Potter? Were they coincidental, or did Disney rush an immersive land once they found out what Universal was doing? Are they even related, different coasts and all?

I really think without Rowling's direct involvement the Wizarding world would not have happened too risky for the suits. Without her Uni would have passed, As to the others TDS is NOT a Disney owned park OLC owns that and they still commission WDI to build stuff like it used to be built, Carsland took all of Lasseter's political capital to get built and Avatar/SWL well we'll have to see those first to see what actually gets built. Frankly I'm expecting NFL like results.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Here's something I haven't really pondered before, would Universal have ever built something like that if it wasn't for a true visionary like Rowling dictating how it went? Did she push Universal to build outside their comfort zone, and thus Universal is on hopefully a new path of immersion? I think Kong shows they can build something highly themed without an outside party guiding them, even though I'm not a big fan of the screen use I am able to admit Kong is beautifully themed.
Early art of the Wizarding World of Harry Potter as a very crude overlay of Merlinwood is out there. Universal Creative was guided by not just Rowling but also the Warner Bros. design team.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
What theme parks over there I can visit that compare to WDW?

Off the top of my head:

Efteling in the Netherlands was a place that Walt Disney visited when he was researching places for Disneyland. Today, they have an incredible mix of fun roller coasters and dark rides in a beautiful green space. Their signature rides are Fata Morgana, a boat dark ride through the 1001 Nights on the scale of Disneyland Pirates of the Caribbean, Droomvlucht, a beautiful suspended dark ride and the Baron 1898, a highly themed Dive Coaster with a dark ride portion and insane theming. Coming in 2017 is Symbolica, a 35 million Euros (around 40 millions USD) high tech dark ride.

Here is a video of Fata Morgana:



Next, we have the Tivoli Gardens in Copenhagen, Danemark. It has been open for hundreds of years and in addition to rides, it is filled with restaurants and is a popular meeting place.

Here is a picture at night:

Tivoli_gardens_at_night.jpg


Port Aventura as someone else mentioned. It was built by Busch Gardens and Tussaud back in the 1990's. Universal then took over and now, the park has local owners. It has incredible hotels, a neat water park and are opening a third gate next year called Ferrari World.

Over in Germany, might I recommend Phantasialand? Located near Cologne, this park has some strict noise and visual restrictions which forced them to be quite imaginative. Whereas Disney just bought off the shelf spinning coasters, Phantasialand went with custom spinning coasters in a large building with elevators, moving track 12 years before Gringotts and other things. Their latest ride is Taron, an incredible launched coaster through a beautiful environment.

Taron.

hd_taron_zug_01-352d165e.jpg


Europa Park is currently the second most visited park in Europe, ahead of Walt Disney Studios Paris. Owned by a ride manufacturer, it is used as a showcase for their ideas and their hotels are incredible true 4 stars experiences.

This is a room at the "El Andaluz", an older hotel there.

Europa-Park-Hotel-El_Andaluz_Themensuite_Velasquez_Schlafzimmer.jpg


They opened a pretty dark ride experience a few years called "Arthur- The Ride". They have a ton of dark rides, over a dozen roller coasters and their efficiently at moving lines make today's WDW pale.


I thought the Walt visiting Efteling was an urban legend.

But I really love the attention to detail Efteling does in the park and even the hotel.

Even as you're entering the place feels exciting and relaxing
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
Here's something I haven't really pondered before, would Universal have ever built something like that if it wasn't for a true visionary like Rowling dictating how it went? Did she push Universal to build outside their comfort zone, and thus Universal is on hopefully a new path of immersion?
Good question, but from my perspective the success of Potter was due to an appropriate scale and an increased focus on retail and food outlets into the land's storytelling. I would imagine that Rowling's involvement was more about tone and detail than these things. Universal Creative had already proven themselves capable of world-class detail and world-building work on prior projects like MiB, Merlinwood, and the entire Jurassic Park area.

If there was a "magic" ingredient in the success of the land I think it's just that the Harry Potter universe in general is just tailor-made for smooth translation into a physical theme park environment and Universal's timing, at the peak of the books' and films' popularity, was impeccable. Being the first major application of robocoaster technology and effectivity serving as the real national debut of Islands of Adventure (Since Universal botched the park's original debut so horribly in '99) didn't hurt either.

It will be interesting in a decade or so to make a case study of Disney's upcoming Star Wars and Avatar projects. One will have been built under the personal influence of its IP's creator (in this case, Cameron in the "Rowling" role) and the other will not.
 

Cesar R M

Well-Known Member
Disney should look at this example to regards to Star Wars. There is a whole SW Universe out there that they haven't started to touch. They should start to look at content outside the world of the Skywalkers.lots of interesting story lines they could dive into.
Isnt that what happened with the expanded universe and ended with total entangled messes up and ridiculous overpowered characters/artifacts/things?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom