A Spirited 15 Rounds ...

[lazyboy97o]

All people are animals. We just like to think differently.

And no, that wouldn’t be the point of putting it there. It’s because the area is very fitting for it. I guess DinoLand U.S.A is somehow a problem too calling Americans who work in paleontology animals. That’s the premise and setting of the entire land outside of going back in time.

The lands are about how people connect with animals, not about people themselves. The park is organized by geography, not culture or politics. DinoLand USA is about dinosaurs and not the American people, the land is not the same as The American Adventure. Wakanda would be about the people.

 

[Mike S]

The lands are about how people connect with animals, not about people themselves. The park is organized by geography, not culture or politics. DinoLand USA is about dinosaurs and not the American people, the land is not the same as The American Adventure. Wakanda would be about the people.

And I’m pretty sure just like other things on this site only the hardcore forum members would care and most people would just be excited about going to Wakanda as an expansion of Africa. They could even include how the Wakandans train Rhinos to work the animal thing in there. The aesthetic is a perfect fit and I’m sure it would be right up Joe Rhode’s alley. It really doesn’t matter though because like I said BP is likely tied up in the contract anyway.

 

[lazyboy97o]

And I’m pretty sure just like other things on this site only the hardcore forum members would care and most people would just be excited about going to Wakanda as an expansion of Africa. They could even include how the Wakandans train Rhinos to work the animal thing in there. The aesthetic is a perfect fit and I’m sure it would be right up Joe Rhode’s alley. It really doesn’t matter though because like I said BP is likely tied up in the contract anyway.

“Black people [belong] in the animal park” would not go unnoticed by plenty of the public.

 

[Mike S]

“Black people [belong] in the animal park” would not go unnoticed by plenty of the public.

“Wakanda, which is in Africa, is being added to a land that is based on Africa.”

Anyone who takes it to mean what you said is as much of an idiot as those that complained about the Redhead. Good thing it definitely won’t happen as I think my eyes would roll right out of my head.

“They live in Africa, why not put them in Africa and give the park another big draw after Pandora?” Is what a logical person would say.

 

[the.dreamfinder]

“Black people [belong] in the animal park” would not go unnoticed by plenty of the public.

They got away with FEA in Norway because it’s a non-oppressed people.

 

[the.dreamfinder]

Here, have some Avengers at Dizzy Parks.

 

[Mike S]

They got away with FEA in Norway because it’s a non-oppressed people.

That’s racist now too? I’m guessing Ratatouille as well?

 

[lazyboy97o]

“Wakanda, which is in Africa, is being added to a land that is based on Africa.”

Anyone who takes it to mean what you said is as much of an idiot as those that complained about the Redhead. Good thing it definitely won’t happen as I think my eyes would roll right out of my head.

“They live in Africa, why not put them in Africa and give the park another big draw after Pandora?” Is what a logical person would say.

The land is about African animals in a park about animals. You’re also ignoring an entire history of equating various non-European peoples, particularly African peoples, to animals, including exhibiting them in zoos.

That’s racist now too? I’m guessing Ratatouille as well?

People think the fictional Kingdom of Arendelle belongs in the park about humans. People think the fictional Kingdom of Wakanda belongs in the park about animals.
That is what is horrible about the suggestion.

 

[Mike S]

People think the fictional Kingdom of Arendelle belongs in the park about humans. People think the fictional Kingdom of Wakanda belongs in the park about animals.
That is what is horrible about the suggestion.

Because the land is AFRICA and it would be an amazing area that would compliment the rest of the park. There’s also more space available near Africa for a big Wakanda expansion but you can put it in World Showcase if you’re so uppity about it.

Oh wait, you can’t. Universal.

I’m done here.

 

[MisterPenguin]

So, putting an African village of Harambe in Afrika in DAK is OK, but putting the African city of Wakanda in Africa in DAK is racist?

OK.

 

[TalkingHead]

So, putting an African village of Harambe in Afrika in DAK is OK, but putting the African city of Wakanda in Africa in DAK is racist?

OK.

On the contrary, there's plenty of cultural issues with the depiction of Harambe, too.

But that's another discussion.

 

[Hakunamatata]

Yes, it's time for that no-good self-promoter and Lifestyler wannabe, the one, the only ... me ... to return with some serious chatter involving the company you obsess about and the business Disney is in.

Topics to be discussed will be SDL, TDR, D23 Expo, Mary Sklar and how they all connect with WDW. If you want to talk about how much you love BB-8 or Thor, want to discuss box office of various summer films (money and popularity does not equate with quality as examples like Walmart, McDonald's and Starbucks prove every day) or talk about how both Bob Iger and Donald Trump are better human beings than Walt Disney, this isn't the place for you. So just leave. Now.

I'd simply ask that people stay on topic and report posts that go way off. This forum is a mighty big place and there are plenty of other places to discuss why charging for FP (what IS coming to WDW) is simply good business.

The curator of this thread would surely disapprove of it vearing off the approved topics.

 

[Animaniac93-98]

On the contrary, there's plenty of cultural issues with the depiction of Harambe, too.

What? You think building a faux impoverished African village for the amusement of middle class American tourists is problematic?

 

[Animaniac93-98]

I'd accuse Joe Rohde of cultural appropriation, except I have no idea what specific culture his choice of earings and fashion comes from.

 

[jakeman]

I don't know guys...I must not have enough white guilt for this topic.

Harambe strives for a modicum of accuracy and is implied as racist.

Wakanda shows a postive afrocentric future and is implied as racist.

I can somewhat understand stretching for both points, but seems rather like a no win.

 

[Haymarket2008]

Guess what, guys? Black Panther can’t be used in WDW. End of discussion. (Justifying it is why we can’t have nice things like....thematic integrity.)

 

[Animaniac93-98]

Harambe strives for a modicum of accuracy and is implied as racist.

At the end of the day it's still Africa viewied through a white lense, made for a mostly white, American audience. You can apply the same kind of thinking to World Showcase or Adventureland, but they can at least use the excuse of romanticism and/or humour.

I'm not saying Harambe is so politically incorrect that it needs to be removed or altered, if that were the case most of WDW would have to go, but it's still a perspective that exists and can be funny to acknowledge. Most guests stuck in line for two hours at KS will never think of it.

Wakanda shows a postive afrocentric future and is implied as racist.

Wakanda in and of itself is not racist. Sticking it in AK because "that's where African things go" is what was interpreted as racist. At the very least, it's a dumb creative decision that doesn't fit AK's message or purpose. I think DHS is the only place it really "fits".

 

[Animaniac93-98]

Guess what, guys? Black Panther can’t be used in WDW. End of discussion. (Justifying it is why we can’t have nice things like....thematic integrity.)

Sure it can!

They'll just close the Main Street Confectionery and stock the shelves with the same toys you can get at Walmart for 3x the price.

 

[jakeman]

Wakanda in and of itself is not racist. Sticking it in AK because "that's where African things go" is what was interpreted as racist. At the very least, it's a dumb creative decision that doesn't fit AK's message or purpose. I think DHS is the only place it really "fits".

Keeping this tongue in cheek because at the end of the day this is all just a bunch of white guilt hot takes.

Wakanda in MK = racist because afrofurture is a fantasy
Wakanda in Epcot = racist because stereotyping
Wakanda in DHS = racist because it's a white interpretation of afrofuture being built for profit
Wakanda in AK = racist because animals

You can't win if you (plural) are driven by hot takes. Which at the end of the day, is what this conversation really is.

 

[Animaniac93-98]

You can't win if you (plural) are driven by hot takes.

Unless you write for Buzzfeed or HuffPost and get paid to do so...