ImperfectPixie
Well-Known Member
I participated in that survey. It sure as heck seemed like whoever requested a survey be performed didn't want it renamed.It seems a guest survey killed the renaming of DHS because no one liked any of the choices.
I participated in that survey. It sure as heck seemed like whoever requested a survey be performed didn't want it renamed.It seems a guest survey killed the renaming of DHS because no one liked any of the choices.
Don't get me wrong, it happens, but not very often. I have several people that forward their surveys to me and the free form text box might appear on several but it's often on things that most of us on here would deem inconsequential.I can personally attest to a text box feature on my most recent WDW survey....now, if any reads them?
Disney's Kaleidoscope ParkTo be fair, most of the "new names" on that survey sucked.
Wasn't one of the choices "Disney's XL Park"?
The options were extraordinarily crappy.I participated in that survey. It sure as heck seemed like whoever requested a survey be performed didn't want it renamed.
Except a number of insiders have given us clues as to what some of the survey results are including things the members of this board didn't think were that popular, but are. We we told that general satisfaction (GSAT) was higher for the MK with Stitch closed than open.
Of course surveys are not free from bias because just choosing what to ask about is bias. We may hate Attraction A and wonder how come Disney never asks about Attraction A so that we can spew our bile upon it. But Disney knows that Attraction A gets a good number of guests according to tracking data, and so they never ask about it.
But then, for example, our beloved Attraction B has been seeing its guest attendance numbers go down, and so Disney puts Attraction B on the survey. And then we panic thinking that Attraction B's days are numbered because of it and shake our fists that Attraction A still isn't being asked about!
Some will say "Hey, the survey is biased!" But in this scenario, no. It's not biased at all. Disney wants to know about an attraction that's getting less attendance, which is a perfectly normal thing to ask about. Or perhaps beloved Attraction B is expensive to run or needs major refurbishment and Disney wants to know if it's worth it.
Surveys are not a suggestion box. Anyone who thinks that they are doesn't understand surveys.
Anyone who thinks Disney hires expensive data and polling analysts and spends hundreds of thousands of dollars a year just to do what they wanted to do anyway is in conspiracy theory territory. Especially because Disney almost never reveals the results of the surveys, so, who are they justifying the results to? Themselves? They could have just decided to do what they want anyway.
No tool is perfect or without bias, but the claim the surveys are a sham is an absurd conspiracy.
It is very rare that a survey question has a free form text box that is relevant to current fan complaints.
That's my point. Free form text boxes are anathema to mass market surveys.It is very rare that a survey question has a free form text box that is relevant to current fan complaints.
Even the guest satisfaction surveys are calibrated across time and relative to other surveyed data points.A major difference is the goal of the survey. There are surveys that are focused on guest satisfaction. There are others that are focused on selecting an action from a list of predefined actions. Having done a number of surveys across the parks, Disney typically uses the latter in its surveys. It actually uses guest satisfaction to filter out the responders. But, they are looking to decide between set courses of action vs. really understanding your opinion.
That's not to say Disney doesn't consider a surprising result in guest satisfaction. It's that they are clearly looking for preference.
For example, you could get a Disney Springs survey. IF it was guest satisfaction, it would be about your general experiences, what can we do better, etc. If it is a selection survey, it would say - which of these specific categories would you like added - quick service restaurant, lounge/bar, sit down restaurant, grab and go food, character dining. You would typically get the ability to make general comments in the second version. But, it's not designed for you to add other categories or options. It's really a poll from selected options.
Neither is right or wrong. But, they have different design intents.
Seems to fit in Tomorrowland.
I enjoy Meet The Robinsons, very underrated and understandably admired by diehard Disney park enthusiasts. I saw @Furiated get livid with my post and it's certainly not my assessment of the work itself. And yes, it does belong in Tomorrowland. But going forward, the day Disney adds an obscure IP to Tomorrowland (TRON is a well known nearly 40 year-old franchise with its own universe) is the day I eat my hat. If I wore a hat. I'll just eat more cookies (so it's a win-win). Do MTB characters make appearances in the park? Sure. But so does Friar Tuck (and I'm still waiting for ANYTHING Robin Hood... for now, random character appearances and some fleeting wall decals in Epcot have to do the trick).
Heh, I wasn't livid, but I do enjoy Meet the Robinsons and consider it criminally underrated.
MGM or bust.It will forever be Disney Cinemagine Park to me!
I did too! Those names were terrible!I participated in that survey. It sure as heck seemed like whoever requested a survey be performed didn't want it renamed.
First, no. No groups of people were angry about Splash Mt. until the echo chamber told them to be.How long have guys been on here "acting like insiders, talking about budgets?" ...and what has it gotten you?
No one cares, it's not what the business is about... it's about entertaining people. When the people get mad about the lack of entertainment or quality of the entertainment? That's when things change ...People were mad there was no Pirates ride in the early 70's ...so one got built ...People are apparently mad about Splash Mountain now ...so it's going away.
The real bottom line is "making people happy" ...if cheap spinner rides like Dumbo make people happy, then they build more spinner rides ...people talking about budgets on the internet means nothing to The Walt Disney Company
Consider the source. This is someone who mocked people for believing the fake news that Disney was building Ratatouille and a gondola.First, no. No groups of people were angry about Splash Mt. until the echo chamber told them to be.
Second, then why are you on a fan forum where people discuss these things? It’s a hobby. If others can talk about trains, planes, and automobiles, we can talk about the theme park industry.
Didn’t know that! Thanks.Consider the source. This is someone who mocked people for believing the fake news that Disney was building Ratatouille and a gondola.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.