jakeman
Well-Known Member
That is funny. I would assume, then, that Tony does not look like Dreamfinder?Ya know what's funny?
When I read that, along with the statement you quoted...I thought you were talking about Tony.![]()
I was gonna have to leap to his defense!:lol:
I am going to put on my flame retardant suit and say something that has been said around here for a while but needs to be said again:
It seems that the most ardent proponents of the stagnation of progress at Epcot resist the change solely on the foundation of "it is different than it used to be".
I am going to go out on a limb here and make some assupmtions and broad generalizations.
It appears that some if not a majority of fans of Dreamfinder and Figment wish to see an outdated attraction with obcure Disney character revitalized soley on the basis of, "well I liked in the 80s". Well, we all liked Captain EO in the 80s and that didn't work out to well...
The same principal hold true for Horizons. I would never imagine that almost seven years after an attraction was close, due to a sinkhole that was undermining the structural integrity of the building, that folks would still be lamenting the loss of Horizons.
The general impression that is left from groups of people that claim that Epcot was better x number of years ago, is that no change would be good. However, Epcot is like anything else, it becomes guilded over time. For example, then I'll take my soapbox and leave, I like "Friends" and think it is much funnier than most comedies on TV right now. This is probably not true, but I remember how much I enjoyed "Friends" and remembered joy is some times greater than current joy, due to a number of circumstances.
Okay, I'm done...