Walt Disney World, in a mere theoretical proposition has recently been confronted with an issue of intrusive development in Orlando's suburban areas. What Disney World property (original measure of 43 square miles) has the singular benefactor of isolation, a mere evolution from the real world to that of the jurisdictions of Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista. Within the property, intrusion of sight from outside properties has been null, once more until recently. Suburban developments near the property borders of the Reedy Creek Improvement District (RCID) are in steadfast growth, not only diminishing perceptions, but also agricultural lands.
I find this somewhat disturbing, as it may not propose a major issue at ground level, yet in higher elevations (The Contemporary Resort Hotel), this proposes the whole diminishment of a natural landscape and elequently crafted design. Light sources at night may also propose a problem.
The principle purpose of this thread is to administer a proposal, that if in theory such housing developments could be stopped (returned to natural environment / agricultural usage) and acquired by RCID, do you think such would be warranted? RCID could utilize previous agricultural lands (Western Property, now Flamingo Crossings) for distric necessities and resort utilization. RCID could therefore utilize the Northern property (Reams Road) for "rented" land usage by local farming operations. Personally this is not a mere destruction of illusion and perspective harnested by establishing persons, but a degration of land and poor strategic in urban planning. Your thoughts on this matter, critical if warranted, are all appreciated.
NORTHERN BAY LAKE
NORTHWEST PROPERTY BOUNDRY
I find this somewhat disturbing, as it may not propose a major issue at ground level, yet in higher elevations (The Contemporary Resort Hotel), this proposes the whole diminishment of a natural landscape and elequently crafted design. Light sources at night may also propose a problem.
The principle purpose of this thread is to administer a proposal, that if in theory such housing developments could be stopped (returned to natural environment / agricultural usage) and acquired by RCID, do you think such would be warranted? RCID could utilize previous agricultural lands (Western Property, now Flamingo Crossings) for distric necessities and resort utilization. RCID could therefore utilize the Northern property (Reams Road) for "rented" land usage by local farming operations. Personally this is not a mere destruction of illusion and perspective harnested by establishing persons, but a degration of land and poor strategic in urban planning. Your thoughts on this matter, critical if warranted, are all appreciated.
NORTHERN BAY LAKE
NORTHWEST PROPERTY BOUNDRY
Last edited:
