with the amount of IP Disney has, there will never be any logical reason going forward for them to add an attraction or replace one without an IP attached to it. it may not be what everyone wants to hear, but it just makes business sense for Disney.
This seems troubling. With all major attractions operating, why would they be needing to lay off maintenance? I suppose some of them may be spread out to resorts, I see the laundry systems so that makes sense since so many resorts are closed.
It's possible that if park hours are shorter than before less workers are needed for the different shifts during the day.This seems troubling. With all major attractions operating, why would they be needing to lay off maintenance? I suppose some of them may be spread out to resorts, I see the laundry systems so that makes sense since so many resorts are closed.
Possible. I just hope we don’t see a drop in maintenance. :-/It's possible that if park hours are shorter than before less workers are needed for the different shifts during the day.
They must not be expecting that to happen anytime soon.I have some seasonal friends who were terminated. Doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The company pays them no benefits and they are not guaranteed any hours. Seems like you'd want a bank of trained people to cull from during the peak times.
Agreed. Lots of what I’m hearing doesn’t make much sense and is quite concerning.I have some seasonal friends who were terminated. Doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The company pays them no benefits and they are not guaranteed any hours. Seems like you'd want a bank of trained people to cull from during the peak times.
I have some seasonal friends who were terminated. Doesn't make a ton of sense to me. The company pays them no benefits and they are not guaranteed any hours. Seems like you'd want a bank of trained people to cull from during the peak times.
Me personally, I'm trying to figure out how they thought massively reducing staff made good business sense (long term, obviously short term it does because it reduces costs and raises profitability). Most of these cuts are permanent, and in the works pre-Covid.Oh, I don't either. I agree that that's what's going to happen.
I just don't think it's necessarily the smartest business decision.
That's the Walmart model...so help me if they pull that...Me personally, I'm trying to figure out how they thought massively reducing staff made good business sense (long term, obviously short term it does because it reduces costs and raises profitability). Most of these cuts are permanent, and in the works pre-Covid.
Which means they somehow thought it was acceptable to reduce staff in conjunction with a variety of measures designed to increase attendance: new resorts, epcot overhaul, several big ticket attractions just built and on the way. so they want to pack in people over the next 5+ years with far less staff to assist? I have to imagine guest satisfaction would take a huge dive. Do they just not care?
...this train of thought is not counting what Covid has done to attendance of course.
I agree, the people are what is important. This company will be and operate in a different vein going forward.This week and today have been another day of carnage. So so sad.
My thoughts are with those affected.
It is really sad. In the FB site Ear for Each Other, laid off cast share stories trying to market their side work for cash but also talking about getting the dreaded " phone call " that seals their fate.This week and today have been another round of carnage. So so sad.
My thoughts are with those affected.
Comcast tried to buy Disney years ago. The Disney Board said their offer was too low.I agree, the people are what is important. This company will be and operate in a different vein going forward.
My 6pm brain drifts to what would you do if you wanted to make a division attractive to a buyer? Make it lean? Have excellent prospects of growth but will take time and investment?
I know, I know it is not what is going on but the thoughts just boil and bubble....
I do own a flame suit for any that feel the need to skewer for even letting this cross the threshold of my awareness, blast away.
Iger does not think the parks are an ongoing business. He has said so. I would not put it past him whispering the other BoD member's ears that this is an excellent time to spin off.Comcast tried to buy Disney years ago. The Disney Board said their offer was too low.
I’d estimate the odds of seeing a drop in maintenance are somewhere between 99.5-99.9%Possible. I just hope we don’t see a drop in maintenance. :-/
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.