RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
Joe Rohde would be the one cancelling it.If Joe Rohde was involved, would that change your mind?
Joe Rohde would be the one cancelling it.If Joe Rohde was involved, would that change your mind?
Mission Breakout is absolutely an improvement over what was there. He was given an assignment and did it quickly and effectively. Is that really your go to example?Even Rohde is not perfect. (See: Giant Oil Rig building where Tower of Terror used to be at DCA.)
Mission Breakout is absolutely an improvement over what was there. He was given an assignment and did it quickly and effectively. Is that really your go to example?
The figures on the screen are just movie theater sized.
The place being an explicitly artifical tree (movie) house also makes more sense, unless you thought the Tree of Life was rotting.
That's the million dollar question. I think I know the answer.Unless they're reaching new levels of laziness, and the new attraction is just presented as us watching a movie.
So we can look forward to more “Rohde Magic” like this:Joe Rohde would be the one cancelling it.
I could remember wrong, but wasn’t the budget for AK cut significantly and this hamstrung the dinosaur area of the park and how much the imagineers could realistically do?So we can look forward to more “Rohde Magic” like this:
View attachment 806310
Look closely kids, that’s real authentic asphalt cracks!
Ah yes, the inevitable “Rohde Magical List of Excuses”:I could remember wrong, but wasn’t the budget for AK cut significantly and this hamstrung the dinosaur area of the park and how much the imagineers could realistically do?
"I will fix the yeti someday"Ah yes, the inevitable “Rohde Magical List of Excuses”:
“Uh, uh, the budget was cut forcing me to make this embarrassing mess!”
“The timeframe was too short for doing actual quality work!”
“Management told me to build one of the most hideous structures in theme park history and permanently destroy the views of not one, but two parks!”
“The accountants told me to write an idiotic script about raccoon hands and repeatedly shouting at people to RAISE THEIR HANDS!!!!”
“The dog ate my homework and the sun got in my eyes!”
You’re judged by the end result - you built it, you own it.
Exactly."I will fix the yeti someday"
I thought that was the case. Also, given the popularity of the original Jurassic Park movies at that time, my guess is that execs wanted to add dinosaurs, even if they weren’t a good fit thematically or in terms of age range (While tons of kids love dinosaurs, there’s probably a reason they’re not a popular theme park theme. Realistic dinosaurs scare young kids but cutesy dinosaurs just don’t quite work. They’ve got some interesting dinosaur exhibits for kids now like Dinos Alive, but they feature ferocious, sharp toothed predators. You would have to know your child and know if they could handle that.)I could remember wrong, but wasn’t the budget for AK cut significantly and this hamstrung the dinosaur area of the park and how much the imagineers could realistically do?
Exactly.
Apparently, they did not include a visit to a structural engineering firm during their endless boondoggles - er, I mean "thematic scouting trips" - around the globe to collect more junk for the queue.
The key animatronic and finale of the entire attraction hasn't worked for years, but it's fine....
But hey, did we mention all of the junk in the queue?!
Heimlich's Choo Choo is irreplaceable.Can we at least get DCA's old Bug's Land where Chester and Hester is in exchange for this? I know the attractions were really basic but that was sort of the point of it. It was also very green and lush.
EDIT: Well....scrap that idea. Encanto and Indy it is I guess.
This is a bizarre argument -- using this logic, Tony Baxter is a terrible Imagineer because Splash was in terrible condition with broken AAs and was eventually replaced.
Rohde certainly isn't perfect, but he's one of the best Imagineers ever. If you actually care about Disney parks and want them to be quality, you'd want Disney to have 30 Joe Rohdes. Being anti-Rohde essentially means you're in favor of all of the things Disney has done over the past 15-20 years, like new EPCOT.
“Hey, I’m a raccoon so my hands won’t scan the thingamajig to release the whatchamacallit so I need your hands to scan - or something!!! Raise your hands!!!!”This is a bizarre argument -- using this logic, Tony Baxter is a terrible Imagineer because Splash was in terrible condition with broken AAs and was eventually replaced.
Rohde certainly isn't perfect, but he's one of the best Imagineers ever. If you actually care about Disney parks and want them to be quality, you'd want Disney to have 30 Joe Rohdes. Being anti-Rohde essentially means you're in favor of all of the things Disney has done over the past 15-20 years, like new EPCOT.
“Bah, good enough”Yeah I get that there is a lot of fan anger at the moment but Rohdes seems like an unlikely target. The odds of agreeing with another person’s stylistic choices 100% of the time are slim, but I think there’s little doubt he cared about guest experience. There was no “Bah, good enough,” mindset there that I can see.
“Bah, good enough”
- Joe Rohde
This attraction makeover turned out to be a hoot.
You doing ok Epcot81Fan? Just seems like you’ve had a rapid shift in tone recently.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.