Search results

I think I lived that with the patriots offense last season. But I accept that as my penance for the run we just had

Or go back to the original fastpass system (but digital) and have it based on attractions that only have demand for it instead of everything under the sun. The original fastpass had a basis in crowd flow and capacity management. Everything after has just been a Pandora’s box set on by...

That’s the point. Less people using the system means shorter stand by queues. I’d much prefer that (which I also wouldn’t buy) and wait in a constantly moving line than this absolute mess they’ve made with a “pay to use” system that isn’t a barrier for entry to most folks going to the parks

No doubt. It would cause a massive uproar, but they’ve created a monster they can’t get the reins on since they went to fastpass plus

The only “good” system would be to go to an express system like universal that’s prohibitively expensive and capped at a low threshold. Which is p much stand by for 90%+ of people, which would irritate a lot but I’d rather do that at this point than this constant charade

I guess I’m gonna have to watch the fastpass defunctland documentary again to celebrate whatever this is

Those hinges definitely look 40 years old. Need some WD40

I think they could stagger things so it’s not being planned all at once; phase 1 of BBT, stitch replacement, and then phase 2 of beyond for example. Would also depend what/if they have anything big planned for the other parks besides tropical americas

One thing I still believe Disney is the masters at is crowd flow. I have no doubt they’ll make sure the paths are sufficient for whatever they build in BBT

I don’t hate monsters inc as much as many folks do honestly. But the stitch building being empty sucks. Though I don’t see why Disney can’t reinvest in this space while also working on the BBT except their lack of ambition

I was always a big fan of the 94 refurb to the land, though that is the one I grew up with. I hate how they did a half a redo of the aesthetics of the land and then quit with what was done and left the rest with the Tomorrowland 94 aesthetic. Just please, pick a lane Disney, and commit to it one...

GM’s clearly finding value in sponsoring this, I certainly won’t ever say it won’t happen, but it seems like they’re at the point of “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” (just rehabs every decade or so)

Name a more iconic duo

Bold and brash?

Considering the deluge that Florida got last week, seems like they got the refill for whatever levels they needed all in one shot

As others have mentioned, the revenue or exposure GM gets from this interests me. Considering they’ve been finding an Epcot pavilion for 40 plus years there has to be a solid return for them in some shape or form

The unreliability was definitely a big downer for me. I’m still unsure how folks would get some of the high performance scores they got on the car design, especially with the limited time you had to do the design

This. It was a neat concept, but i don’t think it ever really clicked the way it was meant to

Mr Iger, tear down this awning!