plutofan15
Well-Known Member
Net loss. While MDE did have subscriber growth, the cost of the streaming service launch netted out to an overall loss.Define "losing money."
You mean "profiting less" or "net loss"?
Net loss. While MDE did have subscriber growth, the cost of the streaming service launch netted out to an overall loss.Define "losing money."
You mean "profiting less" or "net loss"?
The Star Wars fanbase is indeed difficult, and in many ways impossible to please.It was not about Iger's ego not allowing him to see issues with the sequels, it was about Iger forgetting that the Star Wars fanbase is notoriously impossible to please and full of some deeply, deeply rotten people (and I say this as a member of said fanbase) and that even if the sequels were the best films ever made in the history of cinema, there'd be a line out the door of people with lists of reasons they hated them as long as my forearm.
It was perfectly reasonable to design the land with the sequels in mind, especially when the reception to the first of them was massive enthusiasm. Very few could've predicted what was going to happen culturally around those movies. By the time people started acting stupid, it was way too late for them to change course on that.
You really, really cannot blame everything you don't like on Bob Iger and/or his ego. Issues run much deeper than Iger as a lone figure, and in some cases you're drawing a connection to Iger that just isn't even really even there.
Let's critique Bob Iger for real, tangible reasons (there is no shortage of proven things to call him on) instead of the fan fiction you write about him.
The TV segment wasn't in the red. It was still profiting throughout the pandemic covering the net losses from the other segments.Net loss. While MDE did have subscriber growth, the cost of the streaming service launch netted out to an overall loss.
It was a coordinated hit job by Iger and Kennedy. They were deliberately trying to appeal to the Gen Xers who whined about the Prequels and hate original ideas and just want to rehash their childhoods. Alienate the Millennials and early Gen Z,ers' who grew up with and enjoyed the Prequels, maybe attract a new audience, throw as much passive aggressive shade at George Lucas as possible and betray him and hire Hack director JJ. Abrams known for his anti-prequel sentiments and hope enough of a new audience would by their paint by numbers re-make of A New Hope known as The Force Awakens and then of course it's creatively and emotionally bankrupt follow-ups.The Star Wars fanbase is indeed difficult, and in many ways impossible to please.
Still, Disney could have done a much better job in pleasing the existing base.
Rather, they alienated them and tried to court a new base.
I don't know how much of that was on Iger.
Not everything is a conspiracy. Incompetence is real.It was a coordinated hit job by Iger and Kennedy. They were deliberately trying to appeal to the Gen Xers who whined about the Prequels and hate original ideas and just want to rehash their childhoods. Alienate the Millennials and early Gen Z,ers' who grew up with and enjoyed the Prequels, maybe attract a new audience, throw as much passive aggressive shade at George Lucas as possible and betray him and hire Hack director JJ. Abrams known for his anti-prequel sentiments and hope enough of a new audience would by their paint by numbers re-make of A New Hope known as The Force Awakens and then of course it's creatively and emotionally bankrupt follow-ups.
Net loss. While MDE did have subscriber growth, the cost of the streaming service launch netted out to an overall loss.
It was a coordinated hit job by Iger and Kennedy. They were deliberately trying to appeal to the Gen Xers who whined about the Prequels and hate original ideas and just want to rehash their childhoods. Alienate the Millennials and early Gen Z,ers' who grew up with and enjoyed the Prequels, maybe attract a new audience, throw as much passive aggressive shade at George Lucas as possible and betray him and hire Hack director JJ. Abrams known for his anti-prequel sentiments and hope enough of a new audience would by their paint by numbers re-make of A New Hope known as The Force Awakens and then of course it's creatively and emotionally bankrupt follow-ups.
I beg to differ. Disney+ costs were a net loss.The TV segment wasn't in the red. It was still profiting throughout the pandemic covering the net losses from the other segments.
TV and streaming are separate entities. Streaming is under "Direct to Consumer." Media minus Streaming was still *profiting* billions.I beg to differ. Disney+ costs were a net loss.
Unprecedented demandTV and streaming are separate entities. Streaming is under "Direct to Consumer." Media minus Streaming was still *profiting* billions.
Disney was still airing TV shows and getting ad revenue from TV shows (ABC, FX, Disney, Disney Jr., etc...). Broadcast and Cable TV didn't go dark during the pandemic.
I beg to differ. Disney+ costs were a net loss.
How can you beg to differ about math? The financial statements/figures are posted. Are you claiming the math is wrong? Or do you have a second set of books?I beg to differ. Disney+ costs were a net loss.
As Han Solo said: "It's true, all of it."
That is also a major factor.Not everything is a conspiracy. Incompetence is real.
I believe this was basically the plan at one point - with a few minor differences of course. I think lights motors was going to stay and be part of cars? Etc.Not to get too off topic, but I've always said DHS would have benefitted best with a Star Wars Land replacing the Echo Lake Indiana Jones area, Muppets remaining, Cars Land where Galaxy's Edge sits today,
I don't think there really is a good IP for it in the modern Disney canon, which is part of the problem given the current mandate.This would have freed up the space in Frontierland for a better IP.
Is the current mandate only for WDW? California and Paris don’t seem to have a problem.which is part of the problem given the current mandate.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.