BrianLo
Well-Known Member
I'm not saying they wanted the park to be poorly built. There's also no indication that they consider the park poorly built. This is a subjective take, after all. Do you think they considered IOA poorly built? Because it took them over a decade to add another indoor attraction, which would seem to indicate they didn't see a problem. It's still the only entirely indoors attraction built there in the past 26 years.
I’m not sure what logical breakthrough you are hoping to convince us of. Not being aware they were under designing the park for Florida operations is not a better accolade. It seems a couple of key attractions were left behind that would have made for a better balanced park. Sometimes those decisions all occur in a silo from one another and add up.
That’s kind of both the truth and the reason. All the other reasons make the team sound worse.