Wendy Pleakley
Well-Known Member
Except that is really what we're heading toward, and studios have positioned themselves up for the eventuality of it happening. Heck it wasn't even 5 years ago where we were talking in these forums about that actual possibility happening in the here and now. 5 years prior to that no one thought it was even a possibility. So times have changed.
I think the main reason why so many have been resistant to the idea of a "no theatrical" model is because we as consumers have been trained that the theatrical model was the only way and that anything lesser was bad for Hollywood. Except that there have been other models used in Hollywood for a long time outside of the theatrical model. The direct-to-video model for example has been around for like 40+ years at this point, and many studios used that to make profit for their movies.
So this idea that its theatrical or nothing is what is not viable. Hollywood will always find ways to make movies and make money, even if theatrical is no longer an option.
We'll see what happens.
Without theatrical you don't get the big hits like Endgame.
Netflix is certainly successful but they're more quantity over quality.
Direct to video is a common model but the product is absolutely inferior. Are movie studios going to abandon the Star Wars and Marvel movies of the world? We're not going to get those movies in a world of Netflix budgets.
Maybe we'll see movie studios move into the theater business. No splitting of box office receipts. Suddenly snacks contribute to a movie's bottom line.