What's the context on what they did to their Peter Pan's Flight?
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Country Bear Jamboree is getting new songs and acts
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
As a massive fan of the Pan ride at Cali/Paris, the new Neverland model wouldn't bother me if not for two very major problems-
1- Whoever sculpted the new Neverland model did a horrendous job. It's insanely misshapen and terrible. They had literally three other quality references as Cali, Paris and Shanghai all look right. Still messed it up. It was even worse when it first opened as it had this really poorly designed plume of smoke sticking out of the volcano. They have since removed this plume at least, but the model remains very ugly.
2- They didn't add any painted murals on the walls from those other three versions of the ride. So arguably the largest issue with the WDW/Tokyo version, how black and empty the walls are, was not really fixed at all.
They did add a bunch of fiber optic curtains to the black backgrounds. Which is a good and welcome addition in the Neverland flyover room specifically since the island is essentially literally floating in space. The problem is they used these star curtains throughout the other rebuilt and relocated Neverland sets for the Lost Boys, Indian Camp and Mermaid Lagoon. These models no longer look like an organic part of the island, they're just these small setpieces randomly floating in outer space for no reason.
Incidentally speaking of fiber optics, I don't know why but Paris still has the best pixie dust effect on the ship deck to this very day. Disneyland uses some dull sparkle projection, and Tokyo only covered a small corner of the boat in the effect. Whereas Paris' is a full curtain that covers that entire scene and looks spectacular. Paris overall is my favorite version even now.
As I mentioned in the TBA thread though, WDW's Pan ride has many flaws of its own. I still think it has the best London flyover (especially with the more 3-dimensional buildings), but i'm otherwise much more partial to the versions at CA/Paris. And over the past 5 years, someone has been swapping out a number of the UV lights on a number of scenes with bright spotlights. It has ruined a lot of the scenes and caused a ton of previously hidden walls and backstage stuff to become very visible. Whoever has been doing that needs to be told off.
imagineer97
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Sun Bonnets are accounted for, they've just been relegated to Trixie's back up singers. Probably a punishment for singing their offensive song in the first iteration.
TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
What would end up being my final ride on the WDW splash - the bright white lights were very off on that ride as well. Someone at WDW needs to learn what a dimmer pack is!
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
Tokyo's Pan was originally an exact clone of WDW's 1971 variant (it still even uses the old tournament tent facade). Around 2015-2016, Tokyo's received a major overhaul.
The London scenes were more conservative with their changes, just some general lighting, projection and other minor updates for the most part. Same goes for the scenes from Skull Rock onward. Pretty standard, but also underwhemling as again they still just largely left the black walls/curtains intact and didn't implement any of the detailed murals found in the other versions at CA/Paris/Shanghai.
The entire Neverland room was gutted and redone from scratch. They attempted to copy the other versions of this scene based on the DL 1983 variant. A miniature Neverland model in the center surrounded by a curtain of fiber optic stars. But the island model ended up becoming very misshapen for some bizarre reason.
The scenes with the Lost Boys, Indian Camp and Mermaid Lagoon were also disconnected and lined up in a linear corridor one after the other, just floating inside that same black starry void as the island model. At CA/Paris, these scenes have their own detailed and connecting sets with some lovely detailed background murals on the walls. They all feel like a very organic extension of the rest of the room they're placed in. Not just random props placed in a black void without any rhyme or reason.
MagicHappens1971
Well-Known Member
The imagineers are the same, whether it be a Tokyo project or a stateside project. OLC just hires WDI.
JohnD
Well-Known Member
I'm 99.99% sure that's a no.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
What they need to do is remove those lights entirely and bring back the UV lamps. That's the only way you can make black walls and backstage areas mostly invisible. Unless they want to do a from-scratch rebuild that adds a ton of new murals and overhead scenery to hide this stuff.
Even a dim normal lamp isn't good enough. Plus the props and figures were painted specifically for use with UV light and don't look right when lit with bright normal light.
^This is what a number of the scenes now look like since the past few years. And for those who don't remember or never went on the ride years back, no, the scenery isn't supposed to be lit that brightly and the ceiling and mechanical elements are not supposed to be nearly that visible.
They're not. That's one of the motivating factors behind the new show. They're trying to remove anything that could be deemed problematic.
Mike S
Well-Known Member
I feel like this would’ve gone over a lot better if it was simply updating to more modern country songs than what’s currently there (Queen of Hearts, All my exes live in Texas, etc.) and Bear Necessities was simply there to replace the Ballad of Davey Crockett as the new shows “Disney” song. Speaking of which is “Bear Tracks” original to the show?The announcement from DisneyParks Blog-
New Details About Country Bear Musical Jamboree and More
The Country Bear Musical Jamboree is getting ready to put on a new show for you and will close temporarily beginning Jan. 27 to prepare. Plus, learn more about what’s coming to Walt Disney World’s Frontierland in 2024!disneyparks.disney.go.com
WorldExplorer
Well-Known Member
Finally. I'm sure the child abuse numbers will just plummet now that monstrously stupid parents aren't hearing the singing animatronic bear mention shooting anymore. Or something.
(This sucks.)
(This sucks.)
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Not really. The work is very much project based so each project team is going to be composed of different people. There are also people assigned to different portfolios.
Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
It was another example of WDI making something more like Disneyland, which always had the flyover model of Neverland, and ignoring how WED tried to top that by having guests fly through Neverland.
Virtual Toad
Well-Known Member
Wow, the lighting in Pan is atrocious. Inexcusable really. Does ANYONE in parks management at WDW have a clue about upholding show standards anymore?
TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
you can frame and shutter theatrical lights - a properly focused fixture could be fine if it’s super dim.
aladdin2007
Well-Known Member
someone needs to be told this as well for gran fiesta tour, its really getting bad show. They are doing that in so many rides now, and its an easy fix. Its being done on purpose for some reason (security?) and needs to stop.
and while I know our pan needs some maintenance love, I really like it as is, its the one thing that hasn't been ruined or altered. Would hate to see it get the changes some of the other versions have gotten. spot lights especially.
yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
I actually tend to agree with this - there's something about the ride being largely unaltered from its opening day design that I think is keeping some of the magic in it. I think the other PPF refurbs around the world in the last decade have shown that it's not actually as easy to get right as some might think. The Disneyland refurb in 2015 I feel actually did more harm than good. Several of the new effects appear to be less reliable than what they replaced, some of the projections are obvious and too bright, and London's repaint and relighting has left it looking flatter and less magical than ever before.
There's a really simple, elemental magic to Peter Pan's Flight that I think is what makes it the enduring classic it's become, and even the little bits of tech they've tried to insert in the different versions disrupt the chemistry of the ride. It is old school, and I think that's a big part of it's charm.
I could get behind a refurb of the WDW ride if they stuck to what works with it already. It doesn't need reinvention. Spiff up some of the figures to be more on-model, add some Fiber Optic stars, fill some of the black space with handsomely painted Blacklight sets. Make it look as good as it can and maintain it at those standards. But PLEASE exercise healthy restraint - it really isn't necessary to do anything that couldn't have been done in the 1970's. The ride is stupidly popular for a reason; at its core, it works.
TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
I definitely agree that the new London in DL was a step backwards but everything else is an improvement to me.
I can’t think of any too bright projections?
yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
I feel like the updated face of Big Ben and the 2nd Star to the Right are too bright, giving away that they're clearly just projections and the 2nd one in particular spills too much light into a dark area. The prior solid clock face and 2nd Star effect were nothing to write home about, but I think there could have been better ways of implementing the new ideas that merged better with the existing show.
The projected water around Neverland Island is to me also a nice idea that fell flat. The additional animation it provides is nice, but without a gradient around the outer edges there's an awkward bounding box of rectangular water around the island. Makes it feel like the thing is a model in a sandbox. I get the tech has its limits, but sometimes the best way to overcome those limits is to just avoid using the tech:
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
Not a projection so to speak, but i'll note one particular issue with lighting. The nursery at Disneyland was massively brightened up in one of the major renovations from recent years. This room was previously lit with a much warmer reddish maroon hue, whereas it now has a much more cool white-blue appearance. But to make matters worse, this light also spills out into the first area of the London scene as the window opens and you fly outside. Casting too much of that bright white light on the UV painted props and murals. Washing them out, revealing too much of the building structure and breaking the illusion.