tirian
Well-Known Member
Even in that case, Eisner’s reaction was more about self-preservation than simply not caring about the company’s heritage and trying to make it his legacy.Well, I basically meant post-Disneyland Paris Eisner.
I do agree with your post-Paris sentiment, though. Nearly everything from 1997 onward was a disaster. His main problem stemmed from trusting the MBAs too much and pigeonholing himself as a creative, and ignoring WDI and film execs who tried to explain the company had to innovate again. Eisner became scared of taking risks.
(Edit: The MK went through dark times because Phil Holmes was a terrible VP. DL suffered under Pressler too.)
Iger, on the other hand, wanted people to think he was a creative/corporate genius he never was and never will be. Buying IPs and befriending Steve Jobs doesn’t make someone a genius. It makes them the annoying kid always hanging around the cool ones.
Last edited: