UNCgolf
Well-Known Member
Because those 5 and 6 year olds don't stay 5 and 6 year old? And not everything can be for them. Not likely, but you have to think of "easy overlay" and sometimes that overrules something else. I think you're letting this idea you have it's too kid friendly.
Incredicoaster isn't exactly letting on 5 or 6 year olds and that's just fineit's also 40. They do just fine.
I feel like you're missing the point.
Most of the kids that loved it at 5-6 don't care that much about it when they're 12, at least in my experience. And of course not everything can be for them -- that's exactly what I'm saying. Why do a Cars overlay for a ride that doesn't fit the fan base? Use a different overlay that people of the proper age would want; most teenagers and adults aren't going to care that much about a Cars ride. They'd be better off leaving it exactly as it is than changing it to Cars, because a Cars overlay would almost certainly decrease the popularity.
Using Cars would be almost nonsensical for that ride. Disney is smarter than that -- they wouldn't put a Frozen ride there either; it would just lead to a ton of complaints. I also said my original post that the Incredibles would make far more sense if they were going to use Pixar.
Last edited:
