News Guardians of the Galaxy Cosmic Rewind attraction confirmed for Epcot

[Horizons '83]

Is this just becoming a normal thing, now? It seems like there are a bunch of people who come here just to argue with you about things they don't understand...Just such a weird flex to come in and try to argue some of these points that were known years ago.

Sure, we have differences in stylistic choices, but I sure as hell realize that you are very rarely incorrect in your knowledge of WDW planning and design.

Apparently so, just thumb through the TRON thread for more ridiculousness.

 

[DanielBB8]

Is this just becoming a normal thing, now? It seems like there are a bunch of people who come here just to argue with you about things they don't understand...Just such a weird flex to come in and try to argue some of these points that were known years ago.

Sure, we have differences in stylistic choices, but I sure as hell realize that you are very rarely incorrect in your knowledge of WDW planning and design.

You do realize the argument hasn’t yet been resolved.

 

[Horizons '83]

You do realize the argument hasn’t yet been resolved.

What are you even arguing anymore? Has Martin not proved his point by literally posting the manual?

 

[GoofGoof]

You do realize the argument hasn’t yet been resolved.

It’s been resolved...you must have missed the post

 

[NormC]

This got me thinking every more about the theming inconsistency. Preshow: Hollywood, 1939. Twilight Zone anthology series was 1959 to 1964 with a Rod Sterling performance designed for that time period. The actual attraction opened on July 1994 and the television show to commemorate it on 1997.

It is Serling by the way.

 

[DanielBB8]

What are you even arguing anymore? Has Martin not proved his point by literally posting the manual?

He promised the bellhop backstory will explain the theming consistency as written by a CM, which weirdly suggests Imagineering did no such thing. Unless questions are resolved, then it’s an open question.

 

[ToTBellHop]

He promised the bellhop backstory will explain the theming consistency as written by a CM, which weirdly suggests Imagineering did no such thing. Unless questions are resolved, then it’s an open question.

You're ruining this. I just want Martin to share the backstory with the class without your nonsense.

 

[ToTBellHop]

You mean Hollywood has architecture from different eras like just about any other city? Who knew?

And the Citizens of Hollywood? They don't present as actors pretending to be from the 1940s. They behave as though they are actually in the 1940s.

 

[marni1971]

You're ruining this. I just want Martin to share the backstory with the class without your nonsense.

I will. Once kindergarten has closed. And in a proper place.

Though there does seem to be humble pie around these parts now

 

[FigmentFan82]

He promised the bellhop backstory will explain the theming consistency as written by a CM, which weirdly suggests Imagineering did no such thing. Unless questions are resolved, then it’s an open question.

maybe when you’re older you’ll learn not to get so riled up. Also, When someone gives you legit answers but you just don’t happen to like them, it doesn’t make you right.

 

[trainplane3]

maybe when you’re older you’ll learn not to get so riled up. Also, When someone gives you legit answers but you just don’t happen to like them, it doesn’t make you right.

...says 51 on their profile...

 

[FigmentFan82]

...says 51 on their profile...
View attachment 381968

And yet maturity level seems to be about 13

 

[ToTBellHop]

...says 51 on their profile...
View attachment 381968

If you wait long enough, everyone inevitably stops getting riled up.......

 

[DanielBB8]

maybe when you’re older you’ll learn not to get so riled up. Also, When someone gives you legit answers but you just don’t happen to like them, it doesn’t make you right.

Everyone here claims this is well known common knowledge. So I invite others to explain it to me, but I’m not riled up over knowledge. People tried to explain it to me. Seems like many have provided additional examples of theming inconsistency. I’m not alone in this.

 

[Coaster Lover]

What are the chances we get an official name for this at D23? Or, like Universal did with Hagrid, will we have to wait until four months before it opens before we have an official name?

 

[Rich Brownn]

Not blown up in the MCU, either. Nova Corps was destoryed in the battle with Thanos over a power stone, then the population was halved in Thanos' culling. But Xandar and half of its population still exists.

Well, Thanos says he "decimated" Xandar to get the stone. Sounds pretty bad to me

 

[JEANYLASER]

What are the chances we get an official name for this at D23? Or, like Universal did with Hagrid, will we have to wait until four months before it opens before we have an official name?

I think it will be 50/50 chance to have a official name for this at D23 expo this August.

 

[marni1971]

Everyone here claims this is well known common knowledge. So I invite others to explain it to me, but I’m not riled up over knowledge. People tried to explain it to me. Seems like many have provided additional examples of theming inconsistency. I’m not alone in this.

You claimed to know, then had a hissy fit when told what you thought you knew was wrong. If you weren’t so rude, others may be more inclined to help and explain.

 

[DanielBB8]

I will. Once kindergarten has closed. And in a proper place.

Though there does seem to be humble pie around these parts now

It’s not mature to handwave your promises. I await your transcription.

You claimed to know, then had a hissy fit when told what you thought you knew was wrong. If you weren’t so rude, others may be more inclined to help and explain.

This is not how it went down. I pointed out how theming is inconsistent with evidence of the bellhops. You asked me if I knew the bellhop backstory. I provided information I gleaned from the Internet. You said it’s wrong and offered to transcribe info from CM manual. Of course I was upset because it suggested it is common knowledge and everyone else should know it except for me. It is now up to you to prove what you got resolves the argument. Anything short is not acceptable.

 

[wdwmagic]

It’s not mature to handwave your promises. I await your transcription.
This is not how it went down. I pointed out how theming is inconsistent with evidence of the bellhops. You asked me if I knew the bellhop backstory. I provided information I gleaned from the Internet. You said it’s wrong and offered to transcribe info from CM manual. Of course I was upset because it suggested it is common knowledge and everyone else should know it except for me. It is now up to you to prove what you got resolves the argument. Anything short is not acceptable.

Please stop this.