TrainsOfDisney
Well-Known Member
Not to a lot of people, actually. One of those over-promised, under-delivered situations apparently. But that is a topic for another thread.
Are you sure you’re not thinking of fast and furious? Haha.
Not to a lot of people, actually. One of those over-promised, under-delivered situations apparently. But that is a topic for another thread.
Not to a lot of people, actually. One of those over-promised, under-delivered situations apparently. But that is a topic for another thread.
Says the person who has gone to WDW tons of times, but hasn't made it to ride Gringotts.
Flight of Passage. WORST. OVERRATED. MOVIE. EVER.If gringotts isn’t an e-ticket... what do you count flight of passage? Ha.
Soarin' IMAX has been downgraded so FoP at 8kl has higher ez. Not sure what the frame rate is but I expect its over 28fps easily. The fact that the entire side of the building slides up and down gives a drop feeling Soarin' cannot match. The screen remains hidden until the show begins (unlike Soarin'). It has a highly detailed queue (with an animatronic) unlike Soarin'. The screen doesn't distort the image, unlike Soarin' .......Flight of Passage. WORST. OVERRATED. MOVIE. EVER.
Sorry, I just don't get the craziness for FoP. Was it expensive? Yeahl. Is the video pretty? Yeah. Is it groundbreaking in any way over the 20 year old Soarin' ride? No. one could argue it has lower resolution than the original film version even.
But, I mean, IMAX was invented, what, 50 years ago. So, we have 50 year old screen size, with a moving platform, and your legs are spread apart a few times. It's a cool ride. But barely worth much more time than the crazy long queue and preshows take.
Soarin' IMAX has been downgraded so FoP at 8kl has higher ez. Not sure what the frame rate is but I expect its over 28fps easily. The fact that the entire side of the building slides up and down gives a drop feeling Soarin' cannot match. The screen remains hidden until the show begins (unlike Soarin'). It has a highly detailed queue (with an animatronic) unlike Soarin'. The screen doesn't distort the image, unlike Soarin' .......
Damn straight.FoP blows Soarin' away.
FoP blows Soarin' away.
I have not seen any proof that FoP is 8k.
What are you expecting, a snapshot of the label of the projectors they use?
I'm starting to realize folks on here don't know nearly as much as they think they do
No, just info from an insider.
I didn't say you said anything. Just stating my opinion.I didn't say it doesn't.
No, just info from an insider. I'm quite confident there is no such thing as an 8k 3D projector. Let alone an IMAX sized one.
And it would be fairly dumb to spend that kind of money for the ride. Let alone, I really doubt it was rendered 8k.
I'm starting to realize folks on here don't know nearly as much as they think they do
70mm IMAX was 16k.I have not seen any proof that FoP is 8k. And it doesn't really matter. 4k is MORE than enough for the imperfect human eyeballs that are viewing the video. IMAX film is arguably 8k or more, but again, your eyes simply can't see it. FoP is definitely crisper than Soarin' 1.0, ot 2.0, was.
There is most definitely warping on the edges of FoP. The strobe start is cool, but hardly new.
The motion is more than Soarin', but the video is purposely low on action to keep motion sickness down to please the masses it is targeted to.
I didn't say it doesn't.
Flight of Passage. WORST. OVERRATED. MOVIE. EVER.
Sorry, I just don't get the craziness for FoP. Was it expensive? Yeahl. Is the video pretty? Yeah. Is it groundbreaking in any way over the 20 year old Soarin' ride? No. one could argue it has lower resolution than the original film version even.
But, I mean, IMAX was invented, what, 50 years ago. So, we have 50 year old screen size, with a moving platform, and your legs are spread apart a few times. It's a cool ride. But barely worth much more time than the crazy long queue and preshows take.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.