I should preface this by stating I had a pretty neutral opinion on Gunn prior to learning about his twitter past. I knew pretty much nothing about him or his behavior and twitter history. The first i'd ever heard of Gunn was when GOTG came out, and his position as director and writers for those two movies were still all I really knew about him before a few days ago. I'm also not a huge fanboy of GOTG, solid movies but i don't gush over them like many do. So I went into this controversy with a very neutral mindset.
In case it matters, i'm a liberal. I'm not trying to turn this political, I just wanted to make my intentions clear as not trying to smear him because of political bias. I'm also not hyper PC and really enjoy even extremely dark humor when done right (done right being key here). You need proper context, it has to be constructed in a clever and humorous way and with good intent. It's why I enjoy George Carlin so much, or South Park (who often use humor to attack pedos).
In my opinion (and this is subjective and JUST my opinion), Gunn's tweets lacked what I require to support "dark humor". It just came across as gross, unfunny, lacking in clever construction and seemed to have no intent other than trying to be edgy for the sake of edginess. It's the sort of behavior I more closely associate with the website 4chan- kids trolling people with offensive jabs to try to get attention and cause drama. Except this was apparently an older man doing it. The sheer quantity of tweets he made is also disturbing...
Similar to @raven24 (there's an ongoing discussion in another topic in politics), I am still not sure how I feel about the firing itself. It was quite an easy decision with Lasseter given that he actually sexually harassed women. But "distasteful humor" (if you can even call it humor, and hopefully that's the extent of what it was) is more complicated.
I am also well aware that Disney didn't make this decision out of moral integrity. While I wasn't aware of Gunn's past behavior (again I know very little about the man), the Disney executives who hired him certainly HAD to have been. So the issue broadens from "should they have fired him" instead to "should they have hired him to begin with". They fired him because they caved to public pressure, not because it was the "right thing to do". They had no problem with his behavior until this past week. The moral position should have been considered during the initial hiring process, not a few days ago.
Nah because she has kept going off the deep end repeatedly since then....with excuses and hasn't moved on and accepted personal responsibility for her actions whereas Gunn has.
Very eloquently put. However, I would also argue that while Roseanne made excuses and tried to apologize after-the-fact, Gunn owned up to his previous behavior before he was even hired and apologized and immediately cleaned up his act. To me, that speaks volumes about the type of person he is.
Oh, I absolutely agree. The whole mess stinks to high heaven. I don't think it was right that they fired her, either. I was using the "excuses" thing because that's everyone's favorite thing to blast her for. I'm of the "let's be merciful and forgiving" crowd...everyone makes mistakes.See my post above. I realize that it happened so quickly people may have missed how it really went down, but Roseanne deleted the tweet and apologized before the media even picked it up. She "made excuses" after people screamed that her apology wasn't accepted, her career was torn away from her, and people were demanding "how can you say such things?" There is a stark difference between explaining your actions when the mob demands it, and making "excuses".
I wish I could find it again, but I read an article in which Cernovich said he has many more targets he means to go after in Hollywood. It was phrased like a threat.Since my other post was rather long, I don't want TL;DR folks to miss this at the end:
"Rick and Morty" fans, brace yourselves - Dan Harmon is next. The social media mobs have already moved on from Gunn, they have their next target already in motion. Dan Harmon Deletes Twitter Account After His 2009 Baby Rape Video Resurfaces.
See my post above. I realize that it happened so quickly people may have missed how it really went down, but Roseanne deleted the tweet and apologized before the media even picked it up. She "made excuses" after people screamed that her apology wasn't accepted, her career was torn away from her, and people were demanding "how can you say such things?" There is a stark difference between explaining your actions when the mob demands it, and making "excuses".
Isn't that entire cartoon based on an earlier one Harmon made where the "Doc" character keeps trying to get Morty to perform acts him? I get that Harmon would want to delete all his old stuff as a precaution but he's still very much in the business of (suprisngly well written) shock humor.Since my other post was rather long, I don't want TL;DR folks to miss this at the end:
"Rick and Morty" fans, brace yourselves - Dan Harmon is next. The social media mobs have already moved on from Gunn, they have their next target already in motion. Dan Harmon Deletes Twitter Account After His 2009 Baby Rape Video Resurfaces.
I wonder if anyone that knows anything about Dan Harmon/Rick and Morty ever saw Doc and Mharti by Justin Roiland? I'm surprised nothings ever come of that even though its a harmless, crude cartoon full of high school humor. But Marty is 14(?) in the actual show sooo.... kinda surprised none of these people tried to draw conclusions between them and attack Roiland.Since my other post was rather long, I don't want TL;DR folks to miss this at the end:
"Rick and Morty" fans, brace yourselves - Dan Harmon is next. The social media mobs have already moved on from Gunn, they have their next target already in motion. Dan Harmon Deletes Twitter Account After His 2009 Baby Rape Video Resurfaces.
And that's exactly the business Gunn was trying to grow a name in. His only real fault is that his jokes fell flat and that he failed to delete everything upon his hiring by Marvel.Isn't that entire cartoon based on an earlier one Harmon made where the "Doc" character keeps trying to get Morty to perform acts him? I get that Harmon would want to delete all his old stuff as a precaution but he's still very much in the business of (suprisngly well written) shock humor.
I wish I could find it again, but I read an article in which Cernovich said he has many more targets he means to go after in Hollywood. It was phrased like a threat.
As an avowed "Lefty," you are correct. It is wrong for anyone to go on a witch hunt, no matter where you fall on the political spectrum. People with visibility and power who are guilty of actual crimes should be held accountable for their actions. The longer we, as a society, focus on things that are not criminal or evil, the less capable we become of recognizing and stomping out what is truly criminal or evil. We've become a snake eating its own tail.And being absolutely fair - the "far left" has had their own list, as well. If I had a nickel for each time I read some variation "We did it! Another one bites the dust! Who's next?" after Roseanne was fired, I'd have enough to buy an annual pass to Disney this year.
AMEN.As an avowed "Lefty," you are correct. It is wrong for anyone to go on a witch hunt, no matter where you fall on the political spectrum. People with visibility and power who are guilty of actual crimes should be held accountable for their actions. The longer we, as a society, focus on things that are not criminal or evil, the less capable we become of recognizing and stomping out what is truly criminal or evil. We've become a snake eating its own tail.
As an avowed "Lefty," you are correct. It is wrong for anyone to go on a witch hunt, no matter where you fall on the political spectrum. People with visibility and power who are guilty of actual crimes should be held accountable for their actions. The longer we, as a society, focus on things that are not criminal or evil, the less capable we become of recognizing and stomping out what is truly criminal or evil. We've become a snake eating its own tail.
People need to go to Jimmy John's and find the plaque that outlines what constitutes a sincere apology.I've been following it, too, and they are talking something like 300 celebrity/entertainment folks Twitter feeds have been preserved and processed "so far" - so deleting the tweets won't help.
And being absolutely fair - the "far left" has had their own list, as well. If I had a nickel for each time I read some variation "We did it! Another one knocked off! Who's next?" after Roseanne was fired, I'd have enough to buy an annual pass to Disney this year. Hell, even celebrities like Debra Messing were openly admitting in tweets how "relieved" they were to be rid of her (and in Messing's case I couldn't help but also hear a "good because her rebooted show did 4x better than ours did, but that is another topic, LOL).
The only bright spot to any of this is that it does seem that people are finally waking up to how destructive social media has become - but I see so many trying to separate this like it is some anomaly because they just can't admit yet that is where the problem really is.
Wouldn't it be nice if that's how it worked.People need to go to Jimmy John's and find the plaque that outlines what constitutes a sincere apology.
If the offended cannot accept a sincere apology, the offended can go pound sand.
Absolutely it did.Gamergate played such a massive role in this, yet it has gone unacknowledged.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.