• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

PHOTOS - Monorail Black receiving a wrap for Iron Man 3?

Bparso87

Bparso87

Well-Known Member
JafarMaleficent said:
Still not that excited for it. This is actually the only one I am not looking forward too that is coming out in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Click to expand...
I loved the extremist story line in the comics. The mandarin is freaking awesome and I saw the hulbuster armor in the new trailer does not get much better then that for me. My least favorite one will be caption America TWS. I think Thor will be was better then the first.
 
JafarMaleficent

JafarMaleficent

Active Member
I liked the Tronorail, but the Avengers one I didn't. Doing it for your own movie is like its a one off thing. Doing it for all the Marvel movies isn't making sense. The monorail does not fit into the style of those and the wraps don't have that futuristic feel the Tronorail did. I made sense for the Tronorail to be wrapped. The Marvel wraps not so much. To me at least but to each their own.
 
Genie of the Lamp

Genie of the Lamp

Well-Known Member
I agree with @JimboJones123. I don't really like the monorail wraps, but I definitely would've liked to see an Oz wrap on the monorail green (is there a monorail green?). They could've done one with the Emerald City in the background with the flying cgi monkeys or something. I do have a question though as I don't fully know the terms in the contract for Disney and Uni using Marvel east of the Mississippi. So, I know WDW can't use Marvel IP in any of their parks, but can they advertise/use Marvel characters anywhere else on property like as seen here on the monorails or even use them in DD (or soon to be Disney Springs), the water parks, resorts, etc.?
 
T

Tim_4

Well-Known Member
HM GhostHostess said:
Oh great. Another stinkin' wrap.

Once again, the Disney monorails are not city buses that you can plaster advertisements on. They are your futuristic "Highway in the Sky."

These movies have enough promotion as it is.
Click to expand...

You chronic complainers are something else. Let me get this straight. Public transportation in 2013 is full of advertising but for some reason the public transportation of the "future" wouldn't be? Also, "highway in the sky" doesn't have the term "futuristic" in front of it. You added that in quotes to make a point. If the monorail was supposed to be "futuristic" then you "show" and "theme" sticklers should be throwing a fit that it stops at the Polynesian and Grand Floridian resorts. Certainly the transportation of the future is out of place in such environments.
 
lego606

lego606

MagicBandit
Genie of the Lamp said:
I agree with @JimboJones123. I don't really like the monorail wraps, but I definitely would've liked to see an Oz wrap on the monorail green (is there a monorail green?). They could've done one with the Emerald City in the background with the flying cgi monkeys or something. I do have a question though as I don't fully know the terms in the contract for Disney and Uni using Marvel east of the Mississippi. So, I know WDW can't use Marvel IP in any of their parks, but can they advertise/use Marvel characters anywhere else on property like as seen here on the monorails or even use them in DD (or soon to be Disney Springs), the water parks, resorts, etc.?
Click to expand...

They are allowed to advertise Marvel in non-attraction, non-park locations. Which is why the Marvelorails only run on the Magic Kingdom loop.
 
lazyboy97o

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Tim_4 said:
You chronic complainers are something else. Let me get this straight. Public transportation in 2013 is full of advertising but for some reason the public transportation of the "future" wouldn't be? Also, "highway in the sky" doesn't have the term "futuristic" in front of it. You added that in quotes to make a point. If the monorail was supposed to be "futuristic" then you "show" and "theme" sticklers should be throwing a fit that it stops at the Polynesian and Grand Floridian resorts. Certainly the transportation of the future is out of place in such environments.
Click to expand...
It's just tacky and shows Disney at their most ridiculous. The Studio just has to find a way to let people know this is a "Disney" movie (because everything still has Paramount's logo attached) and Walt Disney World won't refuse the extra money. Maybe they'll devise a bulk rate so Consumer Products can get in on the wrap action. Who wouldn't love the "themed" (the wraps are not a themed experience) Disney Princess or Disney Fairies wrap?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom