This...Has got to be...The most Rose Colored Tik Tok of CM's reaction to the show...
I wonder how many takes they needed to get those reactions? I feel bad for the cast members that had to watch that thing more than once.
This...Has got to be...The most Rose Colored Tik Tok of CM's reaction to the show...
Most of the architecture and engineering work never occurred in house. I never said it did. That type of work has almost always been subbed out.So you’re going to hold your hat on that most of the design and architecture and engineering work still occurs in house and not subbed out?
Don’t confuse this with construction or project management, though which are two totally separate things.
![]()
It's not that far fetched to have a show themed to animals coexisting under a tree that shows animals coexisting. Because clearly, this tree doesn't belong in the park because it defies nature
Of course it did. What are you talking about?Most of the architecture and engineering work never occurred in house. I never said it did. That type of work has almost always been subbed out.
The message in its ITTBAB is also not even tangentially related to animals as well. Same thing with the actual message in Lion King. Ironically, the message that would fit the most in AK would be the ones in (parts of) Pocahontas, Avatar, or at times Jungle BookThe message in that film has nothing to do with nature or conservation but could be misinterpreted as such. Therefore it should not be included in a park about nature and conservation.
Yes, except these two (They know who they are) Oh, and bootleg Figment has to go too.And all these characters are pretty much okay?
![]()
You are severely mistaken.Of course it did. What are you talking about?
Iconic attractions and structures like the Contemporary, splash Mountain and spaceship earth all had their design origins within WDI. Same thing with ride systems that were unique to Disney they weren’t subbed out.
Modern day buildings like the Riviera or the Polynesian Tower or whatever they’re building on Bay Lake, there’s nothing there that’s unique to the heritage of WDI.
This is what the Imagineering field guide states about the ToL..They're carvings all using the same piece of wood. They're not supposed to be all the animals actually hanging around each other and being okay with it.
By this logic, the tree also portrays multiple aquatic species living well outside of water. There's also dinosaurs on it, so I guess Disney is saying dinosaurs are alive and well and exist among modern animals.
OR... it's simply an art piece and not meant to literally be animals sitting next to each other and is not meant to be a statement that T-rexes should get along with macaws.
Unlike Zootopia, which is literally about predator and prey being friends.
Uh, really? You clearly don't know your Disney movies..It's Mad Madam Mim from sword in the stone..Yes, except these two (They know who they are) Oh, and bootleg Figment has to go too.
View attachment 890982
There’s a whole [dubious] story with the Contemporary about Welton Becket not wanting the monorail to go through “his” building. The Contemporary and the Polynesian were both engineered by US Steel.Of course it did. What are you talking about?
Iconic attractions and structures like the Contemporary, splash Mountain and spaceship earth all had their design origins within WDI. Same thing with ride systems that were unique to Disney they weren’t subbed out.
Modern day buildings like the Riviera or the Polynesian Tower or whatever they’re building on Bay Lake, there’s nothing there that’s unique to the heritage of WDI.
You pointed out nothing in your last post. Just the generic vagueness you always seem to convey.You are severely mistaken.
As I already pointed out in my last post, even an iconic structure like Spaceahip earth was subbed out to outside contractors for architecture and structural engineering. This stuff has never been handled entirely in house. You just fell for the marketing and PR. Disney didn’t handle the architecture or engineering of the tree of life in house either.
You should educate yourself on the history of the contemporary.
WDI has a long history of receiving credit for the work of outside contractors, vendors, architects and engineers
You do know the difference between architecture and engineering, right? You don’t have architects doing major engineering work and you don’t have engineers doing architecture work.There’s a whole [dubious] story with the Contemporary about Welton Becket not wanting the monorail to go through “his” building. The Contemporary and the Polynesian were both engineered by US Steel.
Rather embarssingly Sword in the Stone is one of those Disney movies on my watch list that I never get around to.Uh, really? You clearly don't know your Disney movies..It's Mad Madam Mim from sword in the stone..
![]()
Gensler’s entertainment unit doesn’t actually do that much and is more a couple of vanity hires than a true, focused group because that’s not how Gensler is organized.You pointed out nothing in your last post. Just the generic vagueness you always seem to convey.
The design and concept has always originated from within Disney. It was never subbed out to XYZ company to say turnkey design and build this for us. You have a company like Gensler that has an entire group devoted to themed entertainment and attractions that was used by WDI for projects virtually in a turnkey manner.
Gensler was the lead designer and architect for new Epcot.Gensler’s entertainment unit doesn’t actually do that much and is more a couple of vanity hires than a true, focused group because that’s not how Gensler is organized.
Name a project that was subbed out to Gensler in this different manner.
Which is why I used separate sentences, because they had different subjects. The first sentence is about the architect. The second sentence is about the engineers.You do know the difference between architecture and engineering, right? You don’t have architects doing major engineering work and you don’t have engineers doing architecture work.
Your words not mineWhich is why I used separate sentences, because they had different subjects. The first sentence is about the architect. The second sentence is about the engineers.
The Contemporary and the Polynesian were both engineered by US Steel.
How manytalentedpeople did WDI lose over the past 5-8 years - when the whole relocation fiasco occurred? How many defected to the competition?
The number is not insignificant, especially considering what was lost.
They were not. Design of the unbuilt Festival Center was outsourced and lead by DS+R. Stantec served as the architect (and landscape architect) for everything else in the CommuniCore area that was lead by Disney. Stantec would have been the architect of record for the festival center too.Gensler was the lead designer and architect for new Epcot.
With the Bear in the pipe? Pretty sure it's supposed to be snow, but it doesn't make sense in hitting the audience. Also every video I've seen of the show has the fog starting before the Bear is unwedged. You'd think they'd have that timing down.Can anyone explain the fog burst/screen going white scene? What were they trying to emulate there?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.