DCLcruiser
Well-Known Member
I’m surprised they never built an attraction between Thunder Mt and Haunted Mansion. /s Haha
I’m surprised they never built an attraction between Thunder Mt and Haunted Mansion. /s Haha
Interesting article.
Well said.It’s a sad day, no doubt — though it’s hard to argue there aren’t valid reasons behind it. Still, I deeply miss the charm and whimsy that once defined evenings at the Magic Kingdom 20+ years ago. This marks yet another piece of that era fading into history. Today’s audience demands more stimulation, more spectacle. Where imagination once filled the gaps, Disney now has to manufacture it. And that shift will only accelerate until there's nothing left of what once was. I understand they’re making decisions they believe are best for the business, but I can’t help but wonder what it says about where we’re headed as a society.
MK does not need its ROA destroyed to show it’s not Disneyland. I don’t recall ever seeing people complaining about Frontierland but I do recall seeing people complain about the Tomorrowland speedway. If they wanted to “give MK a better identity”, why not start there by putting an attraction or two on the speedway footprint and filling the empty space where stitch used to be? They didn’t have to ruin Frontierland. And now if Tomorrowland ever gets an upgrade, it’ll probably be at least a decade for that to happen.^ bingo, MK has spent way too long being the shadow of Disneyland. It needs this and other unique experiences to show it’s not just Florida Disneyland. It needs a better identity and I think this new expansion begins giving it
I doubt it. I don’t see this opening before 2030.At least it should take less than 5 years like the EPCOT debacle.
By this logic, why not gut world showcase lagoon? After all, it’s just wasted space and guests can go to crescent lake if they want water and boats.Fort wilderness, Bay lake, seven seas lagoon add much more to MK as well. If DL removed ROA their entire resort has no more boats.
I would maybe feel a bit better but probably still be against it. Losing so much water (I don’t care what anyone defending this project says but geysers and maybe a waterfall doesn’t make losing the river okay) in favor of mostly concrete and rock work is a mistake. And that’s not even taking the loss of the river boat into consideration. I’m sad that some things that are there more for ambience just don’t matter anymore. Everything is about “capacity” and LLs.I'm not sure if others that opposed this change are in the same camp as myself, but this would not be as egregious if there was no IP tied to it. If it was just a pacific northwest landscape, with some kind of non-IP based "off-road" attraction traversing it, then it would be alot more palatable, IMO. Maybe even have a small section of explorable caves, as an homage to TSI. I don't want to see TSI/ROA go, but I would be ok with the type of replacement I just mentioned. But it is very obvious that Disney management thinks that only new projects with tied-in IP will make them money, and, with the masses that they are now catering to, they're unfortunately probably right.
Why 1994? As far as I'm aware there were 35 attractions in 1994. 40 attractions in 2008 (Galaxy Palace Theater closed in 2009). There are now only 34 attractions, so we are currently less than 1994 but still more than in 2011 (only 32 attractions then). Once Cars and Villains are open, it should be 38 attractions unless something else closes?All this and the park still will have fewer attractions than in 1994.
An idealized vision of America is at the core of the US castle parks (and EPCOT and even MGM). More importantly, it’s at the core of Walt Disney’s ideology and everything he built. Now, it’s very fair to criticize that vision in whole or in part, but it can’t constructively be ignored or dismissed. Eliminating it in an utterly thoughtless way, with no reflection on what it meant or what its removal means, is tremendously destructive. It will do to MK what has already been done to EPCOT - render it a husk, a work of art with no soul. This is one of the very fundamental problems with executives that don’t understand that theme parks have meaning beyond their role as a cash register.Can I be unpopular and say that’s fine? We are in the US, it’s somewhat redundant to have Americana at the parks. I wouldn’t want a Francophone ride at Paris either. I would take the train to Paris, or Versailles, for that experience.
This would have been a great advertisement for the Monsters area.Ok, good on them getting everything already up, etc , but this doorway does look a little funny on its own
View attachment 869351
And the number of people who goto DL based on the size of their boat fleet?Fort wilderness, Bay lake, seven seas lagoon add much more to MK as well. If DL removed ROA their entire resort has no more boats.
“A phrase resounds when it rings true”This isn’t about the best business decisions. It’s about a guy who doesn’t like the park wanting the map to look different so he can say “I did that.”
That being said, the space needed anything compelling (preferably a coaster, but that’s just me).
We are in the US, it’s somewhat redundant to have Americana at the parks.
Interesting article.
Just for the record, what were the capacities for TSI and the Liberty Belle? And do we know the planned capacities for the 2 Cars attractions and 2 Villains attractions? The only one that I can see having less capacity is the 2nd Cars ride, but the combination of 2 Cars and 2 Villains could be more than TSI and Liberty Belle?And they’ll all still have insufficient capacity.
It will definitely be an entirely new place in the next several years.This is the line that sticks out to me from this article. It succinctly says what many of us have been saying or trying to say.
“At some point, if you remove the essential elements of a park, it’s no longer the same place.”
1994 is the year they made a number of closures which continue to negatively impact the park to this day.Why 1994? As far as I'm aware there were 35 attractions in 1994. 40 attractions in 2008 (Galaxy Palace Theater closed in 2009). There are now only 34 attractions, so we are currently less than 1994 but still more than in 2011 (only 32 attractions then). Once Cars and Villains are open, it should be 38 attractions unless something else closes?
quad load stations I believe.Just for the record, what were the capacities for TSI and the Liberty Belle? And do we know the planned capacities for the 2 Cars attractions and 2 Villains attractions? The only one that I can see having less capacity is the 2nd Cars ride, but the combination of 2 Cars and 2 Villains could be more than TSI and Liberty Belle?
And as far as I'm aware, the Monsters Show, Zootopia: Better Zoogether and Indiana Jones should have the same capacities as they're all going to be using the same theaters/ride systems as their predecessors. The only other replacements capacity wise would be Carousel vs Triceratop Spin (which should hopefully be roughly the same) and Encanto vs Primeval Whirl (which a lot of insiders and the site plans indicate the capacity should be bigger). Door Coaster is a new build so will be bonus capacity for HS and the dual load station will help capacity and operations, right?
Discoveryland was great and Space Mountain: From the Earth to the Moon far better than its two successors.Can I be unpopular and say that’s fine? We are in the US, it’s somewhat redundant to have Americana at the parks. I wouldn’t want a Francophone ride at Paris either. I would take the train to Paris, or Versailles, for that experience.
Interesting article.
The parks don’t have sufficient capacity now. They’re going from insufficient to still insufficient.Just for the record, what were the capacities for TSI and the Liberty Belle? And do we know the planned capacities for the 2 Cars attractions and 2 Villains attractions? The only one that I can see having less capacity is the 2nd Cars ride, but the combination of 2 Cars and 2 Villains could be more than TSI and Liberty Belle?
And as far as I'm aware, the Monsters Show, Zootopia: Better Zoogether and Indiana Jones should have the same capacities as they're all going to be using the same theaters/ride systems as their predecessors. The only other replacements capacity wise would be Carousel vs Triceratop Spin (which should hopefully be roughly the same) and Encanto vs Primeval Whirl (which a lot of insiders and the site plans indicate the capacity should be bigger). Door Coaster is a new build so will be bonus capacity for HS and the dual load station will help capacity and operations, right?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.