MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Brian

Well-Known Member
It’s a sad day, no doubt — though it’s hard to argue there aren’t valid reasons behind it. Still, I deeply miss the charm and whimsy that once defined evenings at the Magic Kingdom 20+ years ago. This marks yet another piece of that era fading into history. Today’s audience demands more stimulation, more spectacle. Where imagination once filled the gaps, Disney now has to manufacture it. And that shift will only accelerate until there's nothing left of what once was. I understand they’re making decisions they believe are best for the business, but I can’t help but wonder what it says about where we’re headed as a society.
Well said.
 

psherman42

Well-Known Member
^ bingo, MK has spent way too long being the shadow of Disneyland. It needs this and other unique experiences to show it’s not just Florida Disneyland. It needs a better identity and I think this new expansion begins giving it
MK does not need its ROA destroyed to show it’s not Disneyland. I don’t recall ever seeing people complaining about Frontierland but I do recall seeing people complain about the Tomorrowland speedway. If they wanted to “give MK a better identity”, why not start there by putting an attraction or two on the speedway footprint and filling the empty space where stitch used to be? They didn’t have to ruin Frontierland. And now if Tomorrowland ever gets an upgrade, it’ll probably be at least a decade for that to happen.
At least it should take less than 5 years like the EPCOT debacle.
I doubt it. I don’t see this opening before 2030.
Fort wilderness, Bay lake, seven seas lagoon add much more to MK as well. If DL removed ROA their entire resort has no more boats.
By this logic, why not gut world showcase lagoon? After all, it’s just wasted space and guests can go to crescent lake if they want water and boats.
I'm not sure if others that opposed this change are in the same camp as myself, but this would not be as egregious if there was no IP tied to it. If it was just a pacific northwest landscape, with some kind of non-IP based "off-road" attraction traversing it, then it would be alot more palatable, IMO. Maybe even have a small section of explorable caves, as an homage to TSI. I don't want to see TSI/ROA go, but I would be ok with the type of replacement I just mentioned. But it is very obvious that Disney management thinks that only new projects with tied-in IP will make them money, and, with the masses that they are now catering to, they're unfortunately probably right.
I would maybe feel a bit better but probably still be against it. Losing so much water (I don’t care what anyone defending this project says but geysers and maybe a waterfall doesn’t make losing the river okay) in favor of mostly concrete and rock work is a mistake. And that’s not even taking the loss of the river boat into consideration. I’m sad that some things that are there more for ambience just don’t matter anymore. Everything is about “capacity” and LLs.

On a different note, does anyone happen know what is going to happen to the bridge that connects the main walkway in Frontierland to Thunder? The one where you can watch people who just came down the drop at Tiana’s from?
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
I still think there is a ton of potential for the view from the current lands...

1751909897956.png
1751910176018.png
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
All this and the park still will have fewer attractions than in 1994.
Why 1994? As far as I'm aware there were 35 attractions in 1994. 40 attractions in 2008 (Galaxy Palace Theater closed in 2009). There are now only 34 attractions, so we are currently less than 1994 but still more than in 2011 (only 32 attractions then). Once Cars and Villains are open, it should be 38 attractions unless something else closes?
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
Can I be unpopular and say that’s fine? We are in the US, it’s somewhat redundant to have Americana at the parks. I wouldn’t want a Francophone ride at Paris either. I would take the train to Paris, or Versailles, for that experience.
An idealized vision of America is at the core of the US castle parks (and EPCOT and even MGM). More importantly, it’s at the core of Walt Disney’s ideology and everything he built. Now, it’s very fair to criticize that vision in whole or in part, but it can’t constructively be ignored or dismissed. Eliminating it in an utterly thoughtless way, with no reflection on what it meant or what its removal means, is tremendously destructive. It will do to MK what has already been done to EPCOT - render it a husk, a work of art with no soul. This is one of the very fundamental problems with executives that don’t understand that theme parks have meaning beyond their role as a cash register.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
Fort wilderness, Bay lake, seven seas lagoon add much more to MK as well. If DL removed ROA their entire resort has no more boats.
And the number of people who goto DL based on the size of their boat fleet?

They have the subs still :p

Before F! was butchered, F! was far more important to the DL faithful than what happened around the river bend or on the island. Those battles were fought and lost decade+ before. People wanted the Columbia sailing and the two boats in F!
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
This isn’t about the best business decisions. It’s about a guy who doesn’t like the park wanting the map to look different so he can say “I did that.”
“A phrase resounds when it rings true”

That being said, the space needed anything compelling (preferably a coaster, but that’s just me).

Frontierland already has a coaster, and a thrilling drop ride.

We are in the US, it’s somewhat redundant to have Americana at the parks.

So what should be in the parks? Only movies? That’s Universal.

lest I hear another “Walt’s dead” - the concept of a DISNEY park is rooted in Americana.
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
And they’ll all still have insufficient capacity.
Just for the record, what were the capacities for TSI and the Liberty Belle? And do we know the planned capacities for the 2 Cars attractions and 2 Villains attractions? The only one that I can see having less capacity is the 2nd Cars ride, but the combination of 2 Cars and 2 Villains could be more than TSI and Liberty Belle?
And as far as I'm aware, the Monsters Show, Zootopia: Better Zoogether and Indiana Jones should have the same capacities as they're all going to be using the same theaters/ride systems as their predecessors. The only other replacements capacity wise would be Carousel vs Triceratop Spin (which should hopefully be roughly the same) and Encanto vs Primeval Whirl (which a lot of insiders and the site plans indicate the capacity should be bigger). Door Coaster is a new build so will be bonus capacity for HS and the dual load station will help capacity and operations, right?
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Why 1994? As far as I'm aware there were 35 attractions in 1994. 40 attractions in 2008 (Galaxy Palace Theater closed in 2009). There are now only 34 attractions, so we are currently less than 1994 but still more than in 2011 (only 32 attractions then). Once Cars and Villains are open, it should be 38 attractions unless something else closes?
1994 is the year they made a number of closures which continue to negatively impact the park to this day.
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
Just for the record, what were the capacities for TSI and the Liberty Belle? And do we know the planned capacities for the 2 Cars attractions and 2 Villains attractions? The only one that I can see having less capacity is the 2nd Cars ride, but the combination of 2 Cars and 2 Villains could be more than TSI and Liberty Belle?
And as far as I'm aware, the Monsters Show, Zootopia: Better Zoogether and Indiana Jones should have the same capacities as they're all going to be using the same theaters/ride systems as their predecessors. The only other replacements capacity wise would be Carousel vs Triceratop Spin (which should hopefully be roughly the same) and Encanto vs Primeval Whirl (which a lot of insiders and the site plans indicate the capacity should be bigger). Door Coaster is a new build so will be bonus capacity for HS and the dual load station will help capacity and operations, right?
quad load stations I believe.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Interesting article.

RoA, an "Americana Attraction" is being replaced by Piston Peaks, which is an "Americana Attraction."

Splash got a Georgia setting replaced by a NOLA setting. Still 'Americana.'

The 'refresh' of CBJ is still 'Americana.'

Thunder Mountain is fully refurbed to continue to be 'Americana.'

Mains Street U.S.A. is located <checks notes> still in America.

HoP still doing its "Americana" thing, though it was rumored to go away along with Liberty Square... hold on... <checks parks> ...they're all still there.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Just for the record, what were the capacities for TSI and the Liberty Belle? And do we know the planned capacities for the 2 Cars attractions and 2 Villains attractions? The only one that I can see having less capacity is the 2nd Cars ride, but the combination of 2 Cars and 2 Villains could be more than TSI and Liberty Belle?
And as far as I'm aware, the Monsters Show, Zootopia: Better Zoogether and Indiana Jones should have the same capacities as they're all going to be using the same theaters/ride systems as their predecessors. The only other replacements capacity wise would be Carousel vs Triceratop Spin (which should hopefully be roughly the same) and Encanto vs Primeval Whirl (which a lot of insiders and the site plans indicate the capacity should be bigger). Door Coaster is a new build so will be bonus capacity for HS and the dual load station will help capacity and operations, right?
The parks don’t have sufficient capacity now. They’re going from insufficient to still insufficient.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom