Disney Irish
Premium Member
I agree with some of what has been said recently, that "fatigue" has been used to cover up some bad movies over the years. But I do think there is only so much of a particular genre (or sub-genre) that the public is willing to consume at any one particular moment in time. As the saying goes variety is the spice of life. So for example if the only thing that audiences feels Hollywood is producing is superhero films, even if its a sub-genres (as you said) of other genres, well audiences will get burned out by it, and burned out faster if they are not really good films. Just like I think that horror is starting to get that way since Hollywood is pumping it out faster and faster due to the recent resurgence of horror hits in the mainstream.there’s a debate whether superhero films are their own genre, or a sub genre of action (or whatever type of film it emulates - e.g. Winter Soldier being more akin to a Cold War thriller than a conventional action film. Personally, let’s accept superhero films are a genre. They are still performing steadily over recent years and some have done exceptionally well. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that films that have faceplanted were not regarded as good movies by critics or audiences. Thunderbolts seems an exception to this, but again, it’s the 36th film in a 15+ year span, so perhaps audiences are fatigued by Marvel (and its explosion of mediocre TV and film content) and not the genre in particular. We can test this proposition next month with Superman and FF.
This is true, and the only person who achieved the impossible was River Phoenix.
So I do think fatigue is a real thing, just maybe that its been overblown and overused over the years. We'll see what happens over the next few months with some of these movies.